[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agreement for Original Registration Date

Deacon, Alex Alex_Deacon at mpaa.org
Fri Sep 22 00:32:26 UTC 2017


Thanks to the drafting team for their work on this topic.

I agree with the conclusion that the “original registration date” need not be included or supported by the RDS.

As for the proposed concept of a “counter” I’m not convinced this is needed, necessary or even helpful.  While I wouldn’t object to such an element I would suggest we spend our time debating more important (and useful) matters.

Thanks!
Alex


From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 1:07 PM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agreement for Original Registration Date

Dear Working Group Members,

In follow-up to an action item from the 29 August WG call in which the 22 August poll results<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fdisplay%2FgTLDRDS%2F2017-08-29%2BNext%2BGen%2BRDS%2BPDP%2BWorking%2BGroup%3Fpreview%3D%2F66086750%2F69279984%2FSummaryResults-Poll-from-22AugustCall.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Calex_deacon%40mpaa.org%7C61173ffaf6d940b83ef108d50063283b%7C17e50b56d5dd439b962acc7ecd9ab7fe%7C0%7C1%7C636415348229952185&sdata=2kdhyhbjISFs7r4M4PJvBWzQRgdDl%2F6ecFQdMkJgivU%3D&reserved=0> were discussed, a drafting team was formed to assist with proposing an alternative WG agreement regarding “Original Registration Date” to help the WG discuss and reach rough consensus with respect to this data element.

On today’s WG call, a proposed agreement on the data element regarding Original Registration Date was presented by one of the members (Andrew Sullivan) of the drafting team that had been deliberating on it. In follow-up to the action item from today’s call: “Staff to distribute drafting team output on Original Registration Date to WG mailing list; all WG members invited to review and comment”, all WG members are now invited to review and comment on the drafting team’s proposal.

The proposal, as well as the recording of today’s call, were posted on today’s meeting wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/ZGfwAw<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fx%2FZGfwAw&data=02%7C01%7Calex_deacon%40mpaa.org%7C61173ffaf6d940b83ef108d50063283b%7C17e50b56d5dd439b962acc7ecd9ab7fe%7C0%7C0%7C636415348229952185&sdata=YmC8Kihh5tbNy41NW%2Blyli%2B%2B9t23DWOanmLxp0YdSvo%3D&reserved=0>

Direct links to the proposal in MS Word<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fdisplay%2FgTLDRDS%2F2017-09-20%2BNext%2BGen%2BRDS%2BPDP%2BWorking%2BGroup%3Fpreview%3D%2F66086756%2F69284003%2FVolunteer%2520Team%2520on%2520Action%2520Item%2520regarding%2520Original%2520Registration%2520Date%2520-%252018%2520Sep%2520Update.docx&data=02%7C01%7Calex_deacon%40mpaa.org%7C61173ffaf6d940b83ef108d50063283b%7C17e50b56d5dd439b962acc7ecd9ab7fe%7C0%7C1%7C636415348229952185&sdata=GDtJDjNQF7zjuh6PVMa8Cr5jvSqilrzonbCHyRKsY5s%3D&reserved=0> and pdf<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fdisplay%2FgTLDRDS%2F2017-09-20%2BNext%2BGen%2BRDS%2BPDP%2BWorking%2BGroup%3Fpreview%3D%2F66086756%2F69284004%2FVolunteer%2520Team%2520on%2520Action%2520Item%2520regarding%2520Original%2520Registration%2520Date%2520-%252018%2520Sep%2520Update.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Calex_deacon%40mpaa.org%7C61173ffaf6d940b83ef108d50063283b%7C17e50b56d5dd439b962acc7ecd9ab7fe%7C0%7C1%7C636415348229952185&sdata=ssYPhkik78LXQYrub9%2F1td3xCM4ad2SvMFD8OZ3nNDU%3D&reserved=0> formats are also available.

Thanks.

Amr


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170922/0edf6609/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list