[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

[Ayden Férdeline]

+1 Fabricio. As members of the 'internal task force' on ICANN's compliance with GDPR can attest, there is very little information being shared with the community by ICANN staff. Emails requesting information go unanswered. I'd love to know what ICANN staff plan on discussing with the DPAs in Brussels in the first week of October, too.

—Ayden

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners
> Local Time: 22 September 2017 3:51 PM
> UTC Time: 22 September 2017 14:51
> From: FVayra at perkinscoie.com
> To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
>
> Colleagues – Since our call this week, Stephanie’s comments/concerns about the need for ICANN staff to better coordinate with us regarding proposed meetings/conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners has been weighing heavily on my mind. (Stephanie – I hope I’ve properly paraphrased you here)
>
> I couldn’t agree more with Stephanie and find it incredible that ICANN, despite our ongoing efforts and the plethora of published community concerns, are continuing with the approach of rushing to discussions with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners “half-cocked.”  Putting aside the apparent widely shared view that this approach is misinformed and dangerous, it’s simply redundant of and does not take advantage of our work within this PDP process  -- one could even say that it runs counter to the bottom up and community led initiative on RDS/WHOIS.
>
> To that end, I think we need to more affirmatively address this issue with ICANN by sending the CEO and Board Chair a letter requesting that they immediately hit “pause” and coordinate with us before moving forward.  While we may not agree on many issues, we are all clearly trying to find the right outcome for RDS/WHOIS and have all invested a lot of time to this issue.  As a result, I’m hopeful that others, including Stephanie, will agree to take up this call to action with me before it’s too late.
>
> Finally, further prompting my aggravation on this issue is the fact that I’ve learned that ICANN and Council of Europe are organizing a side event -- ICANN and Privacy -- at next week’s Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners in Hong Kong on 9/27: https://www.privacyconference2017.org/eng/programme.html.  I don’t believe that we’ve been informed of this, let alone the broader ICANN community.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fab
>
> Fabricio Vayra
>
> PARTNER | [cid:image001.jpg at 01D054C5.01001EE0]
>
> 700 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Suite 600
>
> Washington, DC 20005-3960
>
> D. +1.202.654.6255
>
> F. +1.202.654.9678
>
> E. FVayra at perkinscoie.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170922/85aca928/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170922/85aca928/image003.jpg>