[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

[Greg Shatan]

Agree with Alex as well.

Nothing would please me more than to _not_ deal with GDPR.  But, whatever
we do will have to be able to accommodate GDPR.  So, I don't think Andrew's
"division of labor" is quite correct.

I would say that this WG is not the "front lines" of GDPR at ICANN --
current WHOIS is on the front lines and will need to accommodate GDPR
(long) before RDS: The Next Generation comes to a DNS near you.

Greg

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:06:03PM +0000, Deacon, Alex wrote:
>
> > I disagree with Volker that the community does not have an active role
> to play here regarding interpretation and enforcement….the continued
> availability of WHOIS impacts all of us.  I find it disturbing that certain
> interest groups feel others should just wait around until the smoke clears
> before engaging.  That’s not the way multi-stakeholderism works.
> >
>
> I agree with all of that, but I don't understand what it has to do
> with _this WG_.  We have a particular job, and it's not "GDPR".  It's
> "new RDS".
>
> Someone has to cope with GDPR stuff within the ICANN community.  But
> that is not us, and this WG's discussion scope is already immense
> without making it bigger.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170925/c0157cce/attachment.html>