[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

allison nixon elsakoo at gmail.com
Tue Sep 26 16:41:46 UTC 2017


Thanks, will get on

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> Hi Allison,
>
> If you join the call that is going on as we speak, you can see the legal
> advice that we have received from external counsel.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:38 pm, allison nixon <elsakoo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's not irrelevent, because people here keep going on and on about how
> it's going to become illegal to publish any ownership info relating to
> domains, but many other sites on the internet clearly do not follow these
> extraordinarily strict guidelines people want to set for whois. Clearly the
> legal requirements people want to impose here are false. Either that, or
> Facebook and ICANN follow different GDPRs. I see no logical
> counterarguments here, only attempts to throw out my argument so it doesn't
> have to be contemplated.
>
> I had to go inactive for the past month from the group due to unrelated
> reasons. Have we hired a lawyer to look these laws over yet? Or are we in
> the same illogical circular loop?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:26:37PM -0400, allison nixon wrote:
>> > When I search Facebook for "Allison Nixon" and I get back a list of
>> people
>> > with this name, their provided locations, and profile pics, is this
>> also a
>> > leak? no law mandates this behavior
>>
>> It is clearly a way in which Facebook gives off -- if you like "leak"
>> or "radiates" or "discloses" or whatever I don't care -- data about
>> people named that and their photos.  Given that Facebook's data
>> handling is at least controversial with some Internet participants, I
>> hardly see how holding up Facebook practices helps us know what to do.
>> But in any case, it's not relevant, because Facebook is not making
>> policies about public Internet infrastructure and we are.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________
> Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
>
>


-- 
_________________________________
Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170926/8e9e69ae/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list