[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

[John Bambenek]

For those of us who are on the call, can we get that advice and are we
able to ask questions back to them to facilitate dialogue?


On 9/26/2017 11:40 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Hi Allison,
>
> If you join the call that is going on as we speak, you can see the
> legal advice that we have received from external counsel. 
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:38 pm, allison nixon <elsakoo at gmail.com
> <mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> It's not irrelevent, because people here keep going on and on about
>> how it's going to become illegal to publish any ownership info
>> relating to domains, but many other sites on the internet clearly do
>> not follow these extraordinarily strict guidelines people want to set
>> for whois. Clearly the legal requirements people want to impose here
>> are false. Either that, or Facebook and ICANN follow different GDPRs.
>> I see no logical counterarguments here, only attempts to throw out my
>> argument so it doesn't have to be contemplated.
>>
>> I had to go inactive for the past month from the group due to
>> unrelated reasons. Have we hired a lawyer to look these laws over
>> yet? Or are we in the same illogical circular loop?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Sullivan
>> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:26:37PM -0400, allison nixon wrote:
>>     > When I search Facebook for "Allison Nixon" and I get back a
>>     list of people
>>     > with this name, their provided locations, and profile pics, is
>>     this also a
>>     > leak? no law mandates this behavior
>>
>>     It is clearly a way in which Facebook gives off -- if you like
>>     "leak"
>>     or "radiates" or "discloses" or whatever I don't care -- data about
>>     people named that and their photos.  Given that Facebook's data
>>     handling is at least controversial with some Internet
>>     participants, I
>>     hardly see how holding up Facebook practices helps us know what
>>     to do.
>>     But in any case, it's not relevant, because Facebook is not making
>>     policies about public Internet infrastructure and we are.
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>     A
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Andrew Sullivan
>>     ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>>     ______________________________ _________________
>>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> _________________________________
>> Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
--

John Bambenek

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170926/5b3309e5/attachment.html>