[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] ICANN Meetings/Conversations with Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

[Andrew Sullivan]

The plan is to distribute to this list and discuss after people have read it.

A

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:42:12AM -0500, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
> For those of us who are on the call, can we get that advice and are we
> able to ask questions back to them to facilitate dialogue?
> 
> 
> On 9/26/2017 11:40 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> > Hi Allison,
> >
> > If you join the call that is going on as we speak, you can see the
> > legal advice that we have received from external counsel. 
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Ayden Férdeline
> > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:38 pm, allison nixon <elsakoo at gmail.com
> > <mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> It's not irrelevent, because people here keep going on and on about
> >> how it's going to become illegal to publish any ownership info
> >> relating to domains, but many other sites on the internet clearly do
> >> not follow these extraordinarily strict guidelines people want to set
> >> for whois. Clearly the legal requirements people want to impose here
> >> are false. Either that, or Facebook and ICANN follow different GDPRs.
> >> I see no logical counterarguments here, only attempts to throw out my
> >> argument so it doesn't have to be contemplated.
> >>
> >> I had to go inactive for the past month from the group due to
> >> unrelated reasons. Have we hired a lawyer to look these laws over
> >> yet? Or are we in the same illogical circular loop?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Sullivan
> >> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:26:37PM -0400, allison nixon wrote:
> >>     > When I search Facebook for "Allison Nixon" and I get back a
> >>     list of people
> >>     > with this name, their provided locations, and profile pics, is
> >>     this also a
> >>     > leak? no law mandates this behavior
> >>
> >>     It is clearly a way in which Facebook gives off -- if you like
> >>     "leak"
> >>     or "radiates" or "discloses" or whatever I don't care -- data about
> >>     people named that and their photos.  Given that Facebook's data
> >>     handling is at least controversial with some Internet
> >>     participants, I
> >>     hardly see how holding up Facebook practices helps us know what
> >>     to do.
> >>     But in any case, it's not relevant, because Facebook is not making
> >>     policies about public Internet infrastructure and we are.
> >>
> >>     Best regards,
> >>
> >>     A
> >>
> >>
> >>     -- 
> >>     Andrew Sullivan
> >>     ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> >>     ______________________________ _________________
> >>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> >>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> >>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> >>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> _________________________________
> >> Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> 
> -- 
> --
> 
> John Bambenek
> 

> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com