[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: WSGR Final Memorandum

[Chuck]

It's hard to disagree with Sam's point that "ICANN needs a resilient and
sustainable policy strategy here.  A strategy that sits above the weeds of
conflicting GDPRs".  Put in other words that we have all heard many times, a
one size fits all approach will not work for all users, for all
jurisdictions, for all registrants, for all registrars, for all registries,
etc.  

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Sam Lanfranco
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 5:53 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: WSGR Final Memorandum

I remind us that we are looking at some principles to drive a process here,
the selection of the MPDS. We should not get lost in the weeds of
conflicting GDPRs.

Nations will have differences, to be negotiated, and ICANN itself (as
ICANN) should retain some procedural latitude to both navigate those
conflicts, and at the same time accept that it has an organizational
stakeholder interest in the resolution of those conflicts.

This is the world we live in. It will never be neat and tidy, so ICANN needs
a resilient and sustainable policy strategy here.
A strategy that sits above the weeds of conflicting GDPRs.

Sam Lanfranco
(ncsg/npoc)
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg