[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] NTIA letter to ICANN re whois

[theo geurts]

It's a very bad read.

The stuff about DNSSEC is so bad that it be can used in a Benny Hill 
sketch. But we can have a real discussion about DNSSEC at some point in 
another setting.

Theo


On 18-4-2018 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
> well no ... but it's not a bad read :)
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Andrew Sullivan 
> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
>
>     Ob.Nag: Is there anything new in that document?
>
>     On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15:50PM -0700, John Bambenek via
>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
>     > Please include the following in documents for this wg.
>     >
>     > https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/04/17/ntia-icann-whois-apr18.pdf
>     <https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/04/17/ntia-icann-whois-apr18.pdf>
>     >
>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>     > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Andrew Sullivan
>     ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>     gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180418/a3be3357/attachment.html>