[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] NTIA letter to ICANN re whois

[farzaneh badii]

well of course I don't agree with it at all :) By saying it is not a bad
read I only meant it is interesting and to a certain extent amusing.

Farzaneh

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM, theo geurts <gtheo at xs4all.nl> wrote:

> It's a very bad read.
>
> The stuff about DNSSEC is so bad that it be can used in a Benny Hill
> sketch. But we can have a real discussion about DNSSEC at some point in
> another setting.
>
> Theo
>
> On 18-4-2018 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> well no ... but it's not a bad read :)
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ob.Nag: Is there anything new in that document?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15:50PM -0700, John Bambenek via
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
>> > Please include the following in documents for this wg.
>> >
>> > https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/04/17/ntia-icann-whois-apr18.pdf
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing listgnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180418/4bc67b85/attachment-0001.html>