[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] NTIA letter to ICANN re whois
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Wed Apr 18 22:38:46 UTC 2018
What exactly is wrong with the DNSSEC bits? We even have an RRTYPE to make
this possible.
--
Please excuse my clumbsy thums
On April 18, 2018 15:53:25 theo geurts <gtheo at xs4all.nl> wrote:
It's a very bad read.
The stuff about DNSSEC is so bad that it be can used in a Benny Hill
sketch. But we can have a real discussion about DNSSEC at some point in
another setting.
Theo
On 18-4-2018 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
well no ... but it's not a bad read :)
Farzaneh
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:
Ob.Nag: Is there anything new in that document?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15:50PM -0700, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg
wrote:
> Please include the following in documents for this wg.
>
> https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/04/17/ntia-icann-whois-apr18.pdf
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180418/468feabf/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list