[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Legal Inquiry to ICANN
Paul Keating
Paul at law.es
Thu Feb 15 14:45:20 UTC 2018
+1
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 2:56 AM
To: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>, KWASNY Sophie <Sophie.KWASNY at coe.int>,
KIMPIAN Peter <Peter.KIMPIAN at coe.int>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Legal Inquiry to ICANN
>
>
>
> I think this is an excellent suggestion. May I add to this a suggestion that
> we include the DPAs who so kindly came to Copenhagen last year? They
> indicated a willingness to engage further, and I see no evidence that we have
> done so. I am sure the Council of Europe would be happy to broker this for us
> and am copying Sophie and Peter to see if we can engage them to help with this
> task.
>
>
> I must say I am getting very weary of this endless debate, and commend the
> patience of folks like Michael who have been witnessing it for a decade longer
> than I have. I would remind everybody that there has been no substantive
> change in the actual application of the EU laws to ICANN, except for the 4%
> fines. Now, of course, as Bob Dylan famously said, money doesn't talk, it
> screams......
>
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2018-02-14 18:01, Michael Palage wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck,
>>
>>
>>
>> As one of the original authors to the this extraterritorial thread, I welcome
>> all the legal interpretation by both lawyers and non-lawyers in connection
>> the scope to Article 3 of the GDPR. I think it is fair to say there is a
>> clear lack of consensus. Therefore I would like to propose the following.
>> Allow the group to comprise a list of legal questions regarding this issue
>> and forward it to ICANN.org and ask of them the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Provide the list of questions to Hamilton for a response
>> 2. Have ICANN legal provide a response to these same questions
>>
>>
>>
>> The reason for Number 2 is that John Jeffrey made very clear in the last
>> webinar that he does NOT agree with all of the Hamilton analysis. I think us
>> ICANN volunteers toiling away in the PDP coal mine are entitled/deserve an
>> answer to these questions to allow us to move forward with more productive
>> work It does the group no good for a bunch of well-intentioned individuals
>> lacking the requisite legal training to debate these issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>>
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-w>>
g
>>
>
> _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180215/44685f2a/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list