[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Wednesday session didn’t work very well

[Chuck]

Steve,

 

We plan to continue our deliberation on the proposed ICANN Contractual Purpose in our WG meeting on the 27th so if your comments and objections related to that part of our meeting, there will be opportunity to bring them up then.  If they relate to the presentations that were given, there will be opportunity to bring them up when we get to the relevant purposes in the weeks ahead.

 

Chuck

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Steve Crocker
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:00 AM
To: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Wednesday session didn’t work very well

 

The loss of Adobe made the Wednesday session virtually unusable for me as a remote participant.  It was hard to follow without the slides and video and it was impossible to contribute in a timely fashion without chat or voice.

 

I’m not blaming anyone associated with session.  Indeed, I played a small role in bringing the Adobe vulnerability to the attention of icann management.  I’m merely noting the session didn’t work for me.  I had comments and objections I would have offered.

 

I think we need to recalibrate this effort.  I’ll say more next week.

 

Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180316/6c18fcad/attachment-0001.html>