[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Wednesday session didn’t work very well
Richard Leaning
rleaning at ripe.net
Fri Mar 16 20:48:16 UTC 2018
Dear WG members,
I know I haven’t been very active in this group recently and that I didn’t attend any of the f2f meetings this week in PR, even though i was there.
I needed time to reflect on what is happening within this group and the wider issues that are facing the Whois and ICANN. Am disappointed that after 2 years that we haven’t made any significant steps forward even though we have worked very hard to do so. This is not a reflection of this WG or the people on it, but a reflection of the ICANN PDP as a whole, it just doesn’t work any more.
I am therefore withdrawing as a member of this WG and will be an observer only. I will reconsider this decision in the future if i can see some real clarity on what this WG will achieve and how.
Kind Regards
Dick
Richard Leaning
External Relations
RIPE NCC
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 12:00, Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com> wrote:
>
> The loss of Adobe made the Wednesday session virtually unusable for me as a remote participant. It was hard to follow without the slides and video and it was impossible to contribute in a timely fashion without chat or voice.
>
> I’m not blaming anyone associated with session. Indeed, I played a small role in bringing the Adobe vulnerability to the attention of icann management. I’m merely noting the session didn’t work for me. I had comments and objections I would have offered.
>
> I think we need to recalibrate this effort. I’ll say more next week.
>
> Steve
> <signature.asc>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list