[gnso-review-dt] Survey questions: rproposed changes

[BRG]

Hi everyone,
Let me say I think the starting point and breadth of the survey is
excellent. This is no easy task.
 
Please find attached a number of proposed changes to the survey.
The changes in part reflect my role as a previous Names Council chair, GNSO
council member, Constituency member, and working party member of the 2008
GNSO council reform. I tried to think through how I would manage in
answering the questions, and where I failed, have proposed changes.
 
I have proposed a new section for NomCom as this may help with responses
putting all the relevant questions in one place. NomCom appointees are a
different flavour to other groups, and the questions need to reflect this.
 
I have also expanded a bit the final section - where I have added Chuck's
substantive proposals - and indicated support to his other comments.
 
In doing our work, I have reviewed the answers this group got from the SIC
about structure. It is relevant also for us to remember the Board's original
September resolution (below) on the review. The Board expected the review to
be forward looking and we should fulfil that. 
 
Philip
https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2013-09-28-en
 
In its  <https://www.myicann.org/gnso-review?language=es> resolution of 28
September 2013 the ICANN Board stated:

"The expansion of the TLD space has increased the number and variety of
stakeholders participating in GNSO policy making and a review needs to take
place on schedule to examine whether the current model meets the needs of a
new generation of stakeholders. 

GNSO Structure is unlikely to accommodate the anticipated new stream of
stakeholders resulting from the expansion of the TLD space. The GNSO Review
will be an important vehicle for considering and addressing this issue. The
unbalance that is already occurring needs to be addressed by the GNSO
Review. "

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140701/6e720f7a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO survey 2014 v2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 103936 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140701/6e720f7a/GNSOsurvey2014v2.doc>