[gnso-review-dt] RE: Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd

[Gomes, Chuck]

Wow!  It was a very time consuming task going through this.  Here is a completion of my review, edits and comments that I started a few weeks ago.  Note that this version includes both my previous input and my new input starting on page 6 with Section VI of the report.

You will see that I inserted a total of 58 comments plus several edits that are highlighted. In an effort to be responsive to Jen's suggestion of tracking by category, I used the color scheme shown below in her message.

I confess to not yet having had time to read the feedback given by others, so my input was made without that.   I will try to review everyone else's input in the next several days.

I apologize to Westlake for being a little blunt in a few cases.  At the same time I want to thank you for the extensive work you have put into this and for what you will do to bring it to conclusion.  Thanks for listening to all of us.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:05 AM
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd

I hope everyone had safe travels back from Singapore!  I am looking forward to our next meeting on Tuesday, March 3rd.  You should have received an updated calendar invite.

In preparation for the meeting, I'd like to encourage you track your comments about the report in one of three categories to help us organize and guide our discussion:


1.       Factual Inaccuracies.  Anything you believe is factually inaccurate can be reported back to Westlake.

2.       Concerns about any quotes or information cited in the report which could be accurate, but  may create problems or raises concerns in the community.

3.       Concerns about conclusions reached that you would like to bring to Westlake's attention.

[Chuck Gomes] 4. Other

We will plan to go through each section of the report asking for comments in these three categories.  You will still have time after this call to provide additional comments on the Wiki or to send to me or staff and we will compile all feedback in writing for the Westlake team.  Our goal in this call is to ensure that we capture all comments regarding the report so that we can aggregate  feedback in an organized and meaningful way.  Westlake will be on the call and available to answer questions or provide clarification.

If we think an additional call is needed, we can schedule further time by phone to discuss the report and feedback.  I appreciate your time and input into this process and look forward to our call on Tuesday.

In the meantime, if you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to reply to the list or post on the Wiki.

With kindest regards,

Jen

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150314/4e336702/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3 (2) with Gomes input part 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 6377987 bytes
Desc: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3 (2) with Gomes input part 2.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150314/4e336702/WorkingTextforWPandstaff-9Febv32withGomesinputpart2.docx>