RE: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks very much Bill.  I understanding the challenge of coordinating replies and, in fact, am very pleased that you were very able to do it so quickly.  I don’t understand why we wouldn’t thank Westlake and staff for their efforts.  That seems to me to be just simple courtesy.  In a quick read of your other suggested edits, I didn’t see any that seem unworkable from my point of view.

Chuck



From: William Drake [mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 8:13 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Hi

Thanks Chuck for your work here, appreciated.  Sorry for the slow reply but coordination takes time and nobody had factored another round of corrections and rebuttals into their schedules.

You nicely make a number of the points NCUC would raise.  At the same time, there are a couple passages that just don’t work for us, and a couple amplifications we’d add.  I attach suggested edits to discuss on the call later.  If we can get consensus on RT comments fine, if not ok we can each submit separate replies as befits a process engineered to strengthen divisions rather than promote consensus in the community.

Best

Bill

On Sep 18, 2015, at 1:18 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:

I took a first crack at possible Working Party comments on Westlake's Recommendation 23 that we discussed in most of our meeting yesterday.  I have to confess that I am not real satisfied with my draft but I hope that it will facilitate our efforts to create one even if we ignore mine and start from scratch.

If we do develop comments, I think that it would be important for us to try to get unanimous approval by Working Team members who participate in writing and approving the comments or, if we cannot do that, at least provide an opportunity for minority statements.

Open and free criticism is welcome including from those in the NPOC like Klaus.

Chuck
<Draft Points on Westlake Goverance GNSO Review Final Report.docx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150921/a1415447/attachment.html>