FW: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

[Jen Wolfe]

I am forwarding the revised document from Amr.  Thanks, Amr for taking the first pass at making revisions noted.  If you plan to make edits, please send a quick note around so we can track version control.

I would like to add my suggestion that we include either in the opening, conclusion or both that there are 35 other recommendations, many of which there is wide spread consensus for support, based upon public comments, and that we, as the Working Party will be meeting to discuss recommendations on implementation.  Please let me know if that continues to be acceptable to everyone.  

We still need to restructure the numbering as well, per our discussion.  I'm happy to do that.  Please let me know, though, if anyone else wants to make substantive changes and I'll wait to make the structure changes and incorporate my above comment.  We are targeting delivering this to GNSO Council by Thursday, prior to the council meeting.

If anyone from the BC or IPC can offer comments, that would be greatly helpful.  There was no one on the last two calls and just want to make sure you do not object to this communication.  

Thanks so much for your continued support and commitment to this process!

Jen

JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM
513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P 
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc  
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP  
Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM 

-----Original Message-----
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org] 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:57 PM
To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe at wolfedomain.com>
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Hi,

I’ve attached a document to this email with the changes I suggested during today’s call, along with a couple more. As suggested by Chuck, I used a clean copy of the document following the edits provided by Bill, then made redline changes to that so that all changes following today’s call are clearly visible.

Could you please forward this to the working party list for consideration?

Thanks Jen.

Amr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft Points on Westlake Goverance GNSO Review Final Reportspbd + edits by AE.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 29339 bytes
Desc: Draft Points on Westlake Goverance GNSO Review Final Reportspbd + edits by AE.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150922/d0ee1406/DraftPointsonWestlakeGoveranceGNSOReviewFinalReportspbdeditsbyAE.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150922/d0ee1406/ATT00001.txt>