[Gnso-review-wg] Actions/Discussion Notes for GNSO Review WG Meeting on 15 March

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,

 

Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 15 March at ICANN58.  These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which when available will be posted at: https://schedule.icann.org/event/9nmr/gnso-review-working-group.  

 

Note that based on the results of the Doodle poll the next call will be in two weeks on Thursday, 30 March at 1200 UTC.

 

Best regards,

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

 

Action Items/Discussion Notes 15 March

 

Action Items: 

1.       Staff will update the recommendation charters based on the notes captured below.

2.       On recommendations 16 & 18 staff will review the recommendations in the DMPM Final Report concerning Policy Impact Analysis.

 

Discussion Notes:

 

Recommendation 8

--Question: Does the WG become the IRT?

--Answer: It is not expected that the WG would become the IRT, but some continuity is very helpful.  Example: Registrar Transfer Policy.  It is not envisioned that all Working Group members will join an IRT.  The Procedures call for other experts as well.  One scenario: when more than 1 PDP is implemented the is an option to merge IRTs into one.  GNSO Operating Procedures call for the formation of the IRT, but the WG will no longer exist.

 

Recommendation 15:

--Question: What was the original request for timeliness?  

--Answer: Several years ago there was a project or an intent to address how to make PDPs go faster.  What was the PDP Improvements Project Initiative.  Staff can research how these efforts originated.  The Expedited PDP assumed that certain work could be done, but does that satisfy this recommendation?  Per the PDP intiative one of the changes is that Policy Staff include the draft charters in the Preliminary Issue Report.  The wording of the recommendation may have been overtaken by time.  Think about recommending a more formal process be undertaken for speeding up PDPs.  Perhaps, periodically in PDPs to share ideas how it could be speeded up.

 

Recommendation 14:

Question: Should PDP WGs be encouraged to phase or "chunk" PDPs?

Answer: It depends on the PDP, the amount of work, the volunteer capacity.  It should be encouraged when it works.  Classic was the Registrar Transfer Policy, currently the RDS PDP broken into 3 phases.  Should language be added to the PDP Manual to promote phasing?

KPI: How to reword?  Staff will address that.

 

Recommendations 16&18: 

--Question: Where is the Policy Impact Analysis included?  

--Answer: Staff will look into whether a recommendation has been made and whether this has been address.

--Question: Does this relate specifically to the outcome of the recommendations and the DMPM.

--Answer: Staff will provide additional analysis.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170316/4b607b89/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170316/4b607b89/smime.p7s>