[Gnso-rpm-practitioner] Documents - Agenda: RPM Sub Team for URS Practitioners call on Wednesday, 07 March 2018 18:00 UTC

Wed Mar 7 17:54:43 UTC 2018

Quick comments from me as well -- great edits by Greg and others, but 
Greg took the lion's share. Tx Greg!!!

Perhaps we should number the questions of each section in our next 
draft? In terms of distribution, one idea: do we want to circulate the 
questions, and then create an online survey for answering them?  (My 
personal complaint: I hate surveys where you can't see the full range of 
questions ahead of time, and therefore cannot prepare, think about and 
research answers offline, before typing answers.)

To Georges' question, if we are going down the path of asking about 
relief, I think we should be also be adding a question of whether the 
practitioners believe that the URS is being used for the types of cases 
for which it was intended -- clearly abusive cases.  Re: Georges' 
question of asking whether there were problems in obtaining relief 
ordered in a URS decision - absolutely!

Re: questioning changes to the elements of the URS, which is based on 
the UDRP (word for word), I leave that to our subteam discussion!

Best and looking forward to our call in a few minutes,
Kathy

On 3/7/2018 12:00 PM, Nahitchevansky, Georges wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I reviewed the word document provided.  In the tactics and approaches 
> section, should we add a question as to whether or not the 
> practitioners believe the relief provided by the URS (i.e. suspension) 
> is adequate, and, if not, what would they like to see as the relief 
> (e.g., transfer of domain name). Also, should we not have a question 
> asking practitioners if they have encountered any problems with the 
> relief awarded following a URS decision and to describe the problem. 
>  Lastly, on the substantive issues, should we not also ask the 
> practitioner to comment on the three part test and in particular 
> whether the third element should be changed from bad faith 
> registration and use to bad faith registration or use.
>
> Georges
>
> -bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 9:18 AM
> *To:* gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-rpm-practitioner] Documents - Agenda: RPM Sub Team 
> for URS Practitioners call on Wednesday, 07 March 2018 18:00 UTC
>
> Dear all,
>
> Further to today’s agenda, please see the attached documents for 
> discussion: the questions for practitioners (in Word and PDF), and the 
> list of practitioners spreadsheet (in PDF and Excel).  These document 
> will be loaded in the Adobe Connect room for today’s meeting, but you 
> may find it easier to reference the attached documents.  Note, 
> however, that while the changes and comments in the list of 
> practitioner questions are identified by who made them in the Word 
> document, they are not in the PDF (a problem with PDF conversion).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *From: *Gnso-rpm-practitioner <gnso-rpm-practitioner-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-practitioner-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Julie 
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 1:32 PM
> *To: *"gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-rpm-practitioner] Agenda: RPM Sub Team for URS 
> Practitioners call on Wednesday, 07 March 2018 18:00 UTC
>
> Dear all,
>
> Here is a draft agenda for our call tomorrow.  Please note that this 
> is our last call prior to ICANN61, where the URS Sub Teams 
> (Practitioners, Providers, Documents) will provide updates on the 
> status of their work on Saturday and Sunday (URS Practitioners is 
> likely to be on Sunday).  This Sub Team can discuss tomorrow what 
> Jason, as our Sub Team leader, should present.  Staff will plan to 
> prepare the final list of questions and practitioners following the 
> discussion on tomorrow’s call, as well as any other materials the Sub 
> team would like for the update.
>
> Draft Agenda:
>
>  1. Review agenda;
>  2. Discussion on the questions for practitioners – See the Google Doc
>     at:
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1czGq3Y5Z1bVx1ys_MnfLkFE1S-_Dwc3kRzfrTprlNFE/edit.
>     NOTE: Staff will close the document for editing COB today and
>     produce a Word and PDF version for tomorrow’s meeting;
>  3. Discussion of the list of practitioners and outreach proposals –
>     See the Google Spreadsheet at:
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n5ZxlbWnQy7V0cbihmcFxl3Is0dp7rwgpyzPF2VS7pc/edit?usp=sharing;
>  4. Plan and materials for the Update at ICANN61
>  5. Timing of further meetings.
>
> Here also is a reminder of the timing and location of the sessions at 
> ICANN61.  Later today staff will send out the draft agenda for each 
> session and this information also will be posted to the online schedule:
>
>   * Saturday 10 March, 15.15-16.45: Session #1 (in Room 104) – See:
>     https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647688
>   * Saturday 10 March, 17.00-18.30: Session #2 (in Room 104) – See:
>     https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647689
>   * Sunday 11 March, 17.00-1830: Session #3 (in Room 208-BC) – See:
>     https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647553
>   * Thursday 15 March, 08.30-10.15: Session #4 (in Room 103-A) – See:
>     https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647753
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the 
> meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
> Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient 
> intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any 
> attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
> information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the 
> information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY 
> PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 
> 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments 
> without reading or saving in any manner.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. 
> federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any 
> attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be 
> used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
> Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another 
> party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-practitioner mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-practitioner

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-practitioner/attachments/20180307/dbfae4de/attachment-0001.html>