[Gnso-rpm-protection] Revision to Question 4

Fri Jun 16 20:33:28 UTC 2017

Apart from requesting copies of each rule set, I would support an added rule-exception dichotomy for the sub-team questions.

More specifically, since providers rule sets expectedly provide a general rule that names will be blocked, I think it is crucial for the WG to identify those areas of exception where names will not be blocked-whether due to premium names, registry acquisition, or other circumstances.

Our current draft list of questions does not squarely address this dichotomy, and I think it is information necessary to achieve a holistic understanding on the benefits and limitations within the rights protection mechanism landscape.

Thank you,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
Mayer Brown LLP

From: gnso-rpm-protection-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-protection-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-protection-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Levy
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:26 PM
To: gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-protection] Revision to Question 4

Thanks for the feedback, Jon. Perhaps we should list your examples and other specific concerns as 4(a) through 4(z)? Rather than being a limiting factor, I feel this could help guide our review of the rules and focus on those issues of most concern. As currently stated, I feel the question is rather vague.

Steve

From: Jon Nevett <jon at donuts.co<mailto:jon at donuts.co>>
Date: Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:51 AM
To: "Steven M. Levy, Esq." <slevy at accentlawgroup.com<mailto:slevy at accentlawgroup.com>>
Cc: "gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-protection] Revision to Question 4

I don't think the changes are needed. The question already asks for the rules of these services. What's the point of asking specific questions about specific rules for specific services?  Why pick out a couple questions when many other rules are important to different customers (e.g. do they permit blocks of single character trademarks, what about overrides, etc.). Let's keep it simple and ask for the rules.

Also, do we have a subgroup list we should be using?

Jon

On Jun 15, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Steve Levy <slevy at accentlawgroup.com<mailto:slevy at accentlawgroup.com>> wrote:
Thanks, again, to Paul for stepping up and leading our sub-group.  I expect this will be a very efficient and productive effort.

Further to our call yesterday, I've drafted a suggested revision to Q.4 of the Draft Questions for our sub-team:

4.         What are each registry operator's rules for each type of private offering (noting that some new gTLD registry operators offer more than one version of a DPML service)?  Of particular importance, are there exceptions to DPML blocks for domains classified by the Registry as "premium" (or a similar elevated status) and what is the impact on a purchased DPML block when a Registry is sold to, or acquired from another owner?

I look forward to any comments and questions from sub-team members.

Regards,
Steve

<Accent Law Logo NEW Very Small[1].png>

Steven M. Levy, Esq.

Accent Law Group, Inc.
301 Fulton St.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19147

United States

Phone: +1-215-327-9094
Email: slevy at AccentLawGroup.com<mailto:slevy at accentlawgroup.com>

Website: www.AccentLawGroup.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.accentlawgroup.com%2F&data=01%7C01%7CPMarano%40mayerbrown.com%7Ccd4193c9b11b46219d3b08d4b40b3cdf%7C09131022b7854e6d8d42916975e51262%7C0&sdata=SVLpyQxH%2BAgUuGJrsK2Dt3Ha9ZXm4vojIFGnsnKS%2FRY%3D&reserved=0>

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fstevelevy43a%2F&data=01%7C01%7CPMarano%40mayerbrown.com%7Ccd4193c9b11b46219d3b08d4b40b3cdf%7C09131022b7854e6d8d42916975e51262%7C0&sdata=B0PJDNMw3Cz7HRUP4gRtx77lqdkpAwaC83rS8i5kdGA%3D&reserved=0>
________________________________________
Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-protection mailing list
Gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-protection at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-protection<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgnso-rpm-protection&data=01%7C01%7CPMarano%40mayerbrown.com%7Ccd4193c9b11b46219d3b08d4b40b3cdf%7C09131022b7854e6d8d42916975e51262%7C0&sdata=ZXtVFIVnt7UqEIYRIL0zsdto6RptrTeqx2vLLE%2Fr4jA%3D&reserved=0>

__________________________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-protection/attachments/20170616/619f17dd/attachment-0001.html>