[Gnso-rpm-providers] Providers Sub Team Call Next Week - Timing

[Justine Chew]

The Friday time works for me too.

Regards,

Justine Chew
-----


On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 05:04, Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-providers <
gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org> wrote:

> The Thursday time does not work for me. Friday does.
>
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin
>
> Policy Counsel
>
> VeriSign, Inc.
>
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> 703-948-4648/Direct
>
> 571-342-7489/Cell
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Ariel Liang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:02 PM
> *To:* gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-rpm-providers] Providers Sub Team Call Next
> Week - Timing
>
>
>
> Dear Providers Sub Team members,
>
>
>
> Staff would like to seek your advice on the timing to hold a call next
> week for the review of URS Providers’ and GDD’s responses to the follow-up
> questions.
>
> URS Providers and GDD are requested to respond by Monday, 20 August (MFSD
> and GDD have already submitted their responses, updated in tab 2 of the
> spreadsheet HERE
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr5Yt9ZIg/edit?usp=sharing>).
> Assuming we will receive responses from ADNDRC and FORUM on time, it would
> be useful for the Sub Team to meet in order to identify issues and propose
> suggestions for the consideration by the full WG. To facilitate the review,
> staff would be happy to provide a document that summarizes
> findings/issues/divergence (in addition to the spreadsheet of full
> responses).
>
>
>
> *ACTION*: Please let us know which time slot you prefer to hold the call
> (90 minutes – 12:00 UTC is suggested to accommodate members outside North
> America):
>
>    - Thursday, 23 August 12:00-13:30 UTC
>    - Friday, 24 August 12:00-13:30 UTC
>
>
>
> Thank you for your time and consideration!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry
>
>
>
> *From: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:09 PM
> *To: *"gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources
>
>
>
> Dear Providers Sub Team members,
>
>
>
> With support from the Co-Chair, staff have developed a list of follow up
> questions to URS Providers and other sources, including ICANN GDD,
> registries, and registers. Please find the list of follow-up questions
> attached.
>
>
>
> The follow-up questions were developed based on staff’s observation and
> understanding of the Sub Team’s review of the Providers’ responses. The row
> numbers in the chart corresponds to the row numbers in the spreadsheet of
> Providers’ responses
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr5Yt9ZIg/edit?usp=sharing>.
> The target for the question is indicated with “x”.
>
>
>
> Please note the questions/draft emails to registries and/or registrars,
> which are highlighted in yellow, will not be sent out now. The reason is
> that the TMCH Sunrise & Claims surveys will be distributed to the
> registries and registrars next week. Additional questions related to the
> URS Providers issue may distract them from the TMCH surveys and hinder the
> response rate.
>
>
>
> In the interest of time, staff will be sending these questions to URS
> Providers and ICANN GDD now and request them to respond within two weeks
> (by Monday, 20 August). We hope their swift response would help facilitate
> the WG deliberation on issues identified by the Sub Team.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180816/ef4b16bf/attachment.html>