[Gnso-rpm-providers] Providers Sub Team Call Next Week - Timing

[Susan Payne]

Thanks Ariel, either time is fine for me.
Susan

Sent from my iPad

On 15 Aug 2018, at 22:02, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear Providers Sub Team members,

Staff would like to seek your advice on the timing to hold a call next week for the review of URS Providers’ and GDD’s responses to the follow-up questions.

URS Providers and GDD are requested to respond by Monday, 20 August (MFSD and GDD have already submitted their responses, updated in tab 2 of the spreadsheet HERE<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr5Yt9ZIg/edit?usp=sharing>). Assuming we will receive responses from ADNDRC and FORUM on time, it would be useful for the Sub Team to meet in order to identify issues and propose suggestions for the consideration by the full WG. To facilitate the review, staff would be happy to provide a document that summarizes findings/issues/divergence (in addition to the spreadsheet of full responses).

ACTION: Please let us know which time slot you prefer to hold the call (90 minutes – 12:00 UTC is suggested to accommodate members outside North America):

  *   Thursday, 23 August 12:00-13:30 UTC
  *   Friday, 24 August 12:00-13:30 UTC

Thank you for your time and consideration!

Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry

From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>>
Date: Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:09 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>>
Subject: Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources

Dear Providers Sub Team members,

With support from the Co-Chair, staff have developed a list of follow up questions to URS Providers and other sources, including ICANN GDD, registries, and registers. Please find the list of follow-up questions attached.

The follow-up questions were developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Sub Team’s review of the Providers’ responses. The row numbers in the chart corresponds to the row numbers in the spreadsheet of Providers’ responses<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I-qe_I4OkQT7IU_rjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr5Yt9ZIg/edit?usp=sharing>. The target for the question is indicated with “x”.

Please note the questions/draft emails to registries and/or registrars, which are highlighted in yellow, will not be sent out now. The reason is that the TMCH Sunrise & Claims surveys will be distributed to the registries and registrars next week. Additional questions related to the URS Providers issue may distract them from the TMCH surveys and hinder the response rate.

In the interest of time, staff will be sending these questions to URS Providers and ICANN GDD now and request them to respond within two weeks (by Monday, 20 August). We hope their swift response would help facilitate the WG deliberation on issues identified by the Sub Team.

Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry


_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180816/f50f9b0d/attachment-0001.html>