[Gnso-rpm-providers] Time Zone Rotation - 23:00 UTC?

[Justine Chew]

 I think my 2 APAC colleagues would appreciate a rotation to include a more
APAC-friendly time, as would I.

Having said that and speaking for myself, I don't anticipate that many
calls to get through this subteam's work so I'm happy to try to join the
calls at whatever time they are scheduled.

I had a similar experience being on the Trademark Claims subteam where I
found the mailing list to be a useful alternative channel to provide input.
The Rules-Procedure-Supplementary Rules comparison table would be another
constructive avenue for input once that's ready.

Thanks,

Justine Chew
-----

On 22 February 2018 at 08:25, Cyntia King <cking at modernip.com> wrote:

> I’ll make myself available at whatever time(s) work best for the group.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Cyntia King*
>
> E:  cking at modernip
>
> O:  +1 81-ModernIP
>
> C:  +1 818.209.6088 <+1%20818-209-6088>
>
> [image: MIP Composite (Email)]
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Ariel Liang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2018 6:13 PM
> *To:* gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-rpm-providers] Time Zone Rotation - 23:00 UTC?
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> Staff would like to ask your input on potential time zone rotation for the
> Providers Sub Team calls.
>
>
>
> Among the 11 people <https://community.icann.org/x/3BW8B> in the Sub Team
> (nine members + one observer + one WG Co-Chair), three people are located
> in the APAC time zone, two in Europe, and six in North/South America. The
> 18:00 UTC time is especially inconvenient for those in the APAC time zone.
>
>
>
> Would it be helpful that we hold the meeting at *23:00 UTC* periodically?
> This would be 7am in Singapore/HK/ Kuala Lumpur, and 11pm in the UK. It
> is still not ideal, but it would be better than 18:00 UTC when APAC
> colleagues most likely could not attend.
>
>
>
> Of course, the frequency of the rotation depends on the number of future
> Sub Team meetings that we foresee. Perhaps we will gain more clarity after
> next week’s call.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, please let the group know whether holding meeting at
> 23:00 UTC would be feasible, and if so, whether we can do that for next
> week’s call. If not, do you have suggestions on alternative time?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
> *Ariel Xinyue Liang*
>
> Policy Analyst | Washington, DC
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180222/8a1defdc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180222/8a1defdc/image002.png>