[Gnso-rpm-providers] Time Zone Rotation - 23:00 UTC?

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

No problem in being flexible here if it helps to participate.

Cheers,
Martín

> On 22 Feb 2018, at 09:58, Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-providers <gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> No objection to a 2300 UTC call <>
>  
> Philip S. Corwin
> Policy Counsel
> VeriSign, Inc.
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
> 703-948-4648/Direct
> 571-342-7489/Cell
>  
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>  
> From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Michael Karanicolas
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:56 AM
> To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> Cc: gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Time Zone Rotation - 23:00 UTC?
>  
> I have no objection to including UTC 2300 within the rotation of times. Only fair for our APAC colleagues.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Michael
>  
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org <mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>  
> Staff would like to ask your input on potential time zone rotation for the Providers Sub Team calls.
>  
> Among the 11 people <https://community.icann.org/x/3BW8B> in the Sub Team (nine members + one observer + one WG Co-Chair), three people are located in the APAC time zone, two in Europe, and six in North/South America. The 18:00 UTC time is especially inconvenient for those in the APAC time zone. 
>  
> Would it be helpful that we hold the meeting at 23:00 UTC periodically? This would be 7am in Singapore/HK/ Kuala Lumpur, and 11pm in the UK. It is still not ideal, but it would be better than 18:00 UTC when APAC colleagues most likely could not attend.
>  
> Of course, the frequency of the rotation depends on the number of future Sub Team meetings that we foresee. Perhaps we will gain more clarity after next week’s call.
>  
> In the meantime, please let the group know whether holding meeting at 23:00 UTC would be feasible, and if so, whether we can do that for next week’s call. If not, do you have suggestions on alternative time? 
>  
> Thank you for your consideration!
>  
> Best Regards,
> Ariel
>  
> Ariel Xinyue Liang
> Policy Analyst | Washington, DC 
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-providers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180222/c20184fc/attachment-0001.html>