[Gnso-rpm-tmch] FW: Updated list of questions following TMCH Sub Team call of 26 August

[Jeff Neuman]

All,

Assuming there is a call today, but I did not get the invite.  Can someone forward call-in information?

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
Mclean, VA 22102, United States
E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com> or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
T: +1.703.635.7514
M: +1.202.549.5079
@Jintlaw


From: gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of David Tait
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 7:20 AM
To: gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] FW: Updated list of questions following TMCH Sub Team call of 26 August


Dear Kathy

Is this the document you had in mind? Please let me know should you require any further documents to be circulated.

Kind regards,

David

From: <gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com<mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
Date: Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 21:27
To: "gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Updated list of questions following TMCH Sub Team call of 26 August


Mary and David,

Could you kindly send out the most recent version of the "publicly-available documents" listing. I found this work very helpful in helping to frame questions, and it would be great to see the current version (whether changed or unchanged).

Many thanks, Kathy

On 9/1/2016 6:18 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
Dear all,

Please find attached the staff attempt, as requested on the call last Friday, to further clarify and finesse the questions for the various parties we are intending to seek further information from. Please note that in several instances we had a few additional questions for the team, which we have noted in the comments. We have also retained Kurt’s comments and questions from last week, to assist with recollection and further discussion.

Based on the Friday call and the remaining work to be done on the document, we propose that the agenda for the next Sub Team call this Friday be as follows:


1.      Roll call

2.      Discuss and finalize questions for registries, registrars and providers (based on updated document of 1 September)

3.      Staff update on further data extraction and expected dates

4.      Next steps/next meeting

Thanks and cheers
Mary and David


From: David Tait <david.tait at icann.org><mailto:david.tait at icann.org>
Date: Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 01:32
To: "gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org"<mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org> <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org><mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org><mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
Subject: Notes and Actions from today's RPM TMCH Sub Team Meeting of 26 Aug 2016

Dear All

Please find below a list of actions and outcomes from today’s meeting of the TMCH Sub Team. For ease of reference these have been broken down into 3 topics. These are: (1) New links to be added to the working Group reading list (2) Questions to Registries providing Private Protected Marks Lists (PPML) and (3) Further consideration of questions document to be sent to key stakeholders.

(1) Working Group reading list

Action Staff to add links the following links to WG materials list:

1) FAQ - http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml/dpml-faqs
2) Overview - http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml/dpml-overview
3) Main webpage on this issue, including video - http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml
4) Staff to add CCT-RT data to WG reading list
5) http://www.tm-selection.com<http://www.tm-selection.com/> (Action sub team to consider this before upload by staff)

(2) PPML

The ST proposed a list of additional question to be added to ST questions document:


  *   It appears that a TMCH SMD file is required for the PPML, was there push back from people who wanted to use DPML but not put marks into the TMCH?
  *   Did the various PPML services drive users to the TMCH? Are these third party, additional services promoting the use of the TMCH?
  *   Is the 'chilling effect' being extended through these private uses of the TMCH?
  *   Are registrants suitably protected against price escalations prompted by the use of private uses of the TMCH?
  *   How many people are using the TMCH solely to be able to participate in the PPML, but NOT any Sunrise Registrations?
  *   How do you structure your PPML?
  *   How many marks are in it?
  *   Are basic works and descriptions included?
  *   How many of the marks are coined or fanciful terms?

Action: Sub team to review questions on PPMLs before finalisation at next meeting and to consider whether to invite PPML providers to speak to ST or WG

(3) Questions document

The ST proposed a number of additional questions to be included in the ST questions document.

Action: Staff to rework questions in line with comments received from ST and prepare revised draft in advance of next meeting for review.

The next meeting of the sub team will take place on Friday, 02 September 2016 at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes.

Kind regards,

David

David A. Tait
Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland)
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Mobile: + 44-7864-793776
Email:  david.tait at icann.org<mailto:david.tait at icann.org>
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>





_______________________________________________

Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list

Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160902/28880f74/attachment-0001.html>