[Gnso-rpm-tmch] FW: Updated list of questions following TMCH Sub Team call of 26 August

Fri Sep 2 15:01:18 UTC 2016

This is it, tx you David!

On 9/2/2016 7:19 AM, David Tait wrote:
>
> Dear Kathy
>
> Is this the document you had in mind? Please let me know should you 
> require any further documents to be circulated.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> David
>
> *From: *<gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman 
> <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 21:27
> *To: *"gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Updated list of questions following 
> TMCH Sub Team call of 26 August
>
> Mary and David,
>
> Could you kindly send out the most recent version of the 
> "publicly-available documents" listing. I found this work very helpful 
> in helping to frame questions, and it would be great to see the 
> current version (whether changed or unchanged).
>
> Many thanks, Kathy
>
> On 9/1/2016 6:18 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Please find attached the staff attempt, as requested on the call
>     last Friday, to further clarify and finesse the questions for the
>     various parties we are intending to seek further information from.
>     Please note that in several instances we had a few additional
>     questions for the team, which we have noted in the comments. We
>     have also retained Kurt’s comments and questions from last week,
>     to assist with recollection and further discussion.
>
>     Based on the Friday call and the remaining work to be done on the
>     document, we propose that the agenda for the next Sub Team call
>     this Friday be as follows:
>
>     1.Roll call
>
>     2.Discuss and finalize questions for registries, registrars and
>     providers (based on updated document of 1 September)
>
>     3.Staff update on further data extraction and expected dates
>
>     4.Next steps/next meeting
>
>     Thanks and cheers
>
>     Mary and David
>
>     *From: *David Tait <david.tait at icann.org>
>     <mailto:david.tait at icann.org>
>     *Date: *Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 01:32
>     *To: *"gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" <mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
>     <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org> <mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
>     *Cc: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>     *Subject: *Notes and Actions from today's RPM TMCH Sub Team
>     Meeting of 26 Aug 2016
>
>     Dear All
>
>     Please find below a list of actions and outcomes from today’s
>     meeting of the TMCH Sub Team. For ease of reference these have
>     been broken down into 3 topics. These are: (1) New links to be
>     added to the working Group reading list (2) Questions to
>     Registries providing Private Protected Marks Lists (PPML) and (3)
>     Further consideration of questions document to be sent to key
>     stakeholders.
>
>     **
>
>     _(1) Working Group reading list_
>
>     **
>
>     *Action Staff to add links the following links to WG materials list*:
>
>     1) FAQ - http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml/dpml-faqs
>
>     2) Overview - http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml/dpml-overview
>
>     3) Main webpage on this issue, including video -
>     http://www.donuts.domains/services/dpml
>
>     4) Staff to add CCT-RT data to WG reading list
>
>     5) http://www.tm-selection.com <http://www.tm-selection.com/>
>     (*Action sub team to consider this before upload by staff*)
>
>     _(2) PPML_
>
>     The ST proposed a list of additional question to be added to ST
>     questions document:
>
>       * It appears that a TMCH SMD file is required for the PPML, was
>         there push back from people who wanted to use DPML but not put
>         marks into the TMCH?
>       * Did the various PPML services drive users to the TMCH? Are
>         these third party, additional services promoting the use of
>         the TMCH?
>       * Is the 'chilling effect' being extended through these private
>         uses of the TMCH?
>       * Are registrants suitably protected against price escalations
>         prompted by the use of private uses of the TMCH?
>       * How many people are using the TMCH solely to be able to
>         participate in the PPML, but NOT any Sunrise Registrations?
>       * How do you structure your PPML?
>       * How many marks are in it?
>       * Are basic works and descriptions included?
>       * How many of the marks are coined or fanciful terms?
>
>     *Action: Sub team to review questions on PPMLs before finalisation
>     at next meeting and to consider whether to invite PPML providers
>     to speak to ST or WG*
>
>     _(3) Questions document _
>
>     The ST proposed a number of additional questions to be included in
>     the ST questions document.
>
>     *Action: Staff to rework questions in line with comments received
>     from ST and prepare revised draft in advance of next meeting for
>     review.*
>
>     The next meeting of the sub team will take place on Friday, 02
>     September 2016 at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     David
>
>     David A. Tait
>
>     Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland)
>
>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>     Mobile: + 44-7864-793776
>
>     Email: david.tait at icann.org <mailto:david.tait at icann.org>
>
>     www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
>
>     Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160902/faf0c11b/attachment-0001.html>