[Gnso-rpm-tmch] FOR REVIEW/DISCUSSION: Updated list of questions

[Kurt Pritz]

Hi Susan:

I agree with you. The reason we might also ask the Clearinghouse is to get some insight regarding the effect that the length of the time period has upon sunrise registrations. The point I was trying to make below is that the TMCH could probably provide some data or analysis on the relationship between the amount of time trademark holders have to consider a sunrise and the number of sunrise registrations. 

If we think that is a good idea, I can reword the question to explicitly include that part. 

Kurt
________________
Kurt Pritz
kurt at kjpritz.com
+1.310.400.4184
Skype: kjpritz






On Sep 9, 2016, at 6:51 AM, Susan Payne <susan.payne at valideus.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kurt
> I think we should be asking this of ICANN’s Global Domains Division.  The notice is given by the registry to the GDD via the GDD portal.  I believe the GDD passes this information on to the TMCH, so the primary source of the information about the notice of sunrise is the GDD.
>  
> Susan Payne
> Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
> 
> E: susan.payne at valideus.com 
> D: +44 20 7421 8255
> T: +44 20 7421 8299
> M: +44 7971 661175
>  
> Please note I will be on holiday from 19 September, returning 3 October 2016
>  
> From: gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of kurt at kjpritz.com
> Sent: 09 September 2016 06:53
> To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] FOR REVIEW/DISCUSSION: Updated list of questions
>  
> Hi Everyone:
>  
> There is an additional question we might pose to the TMCH:
>  
> --    Provide data on the time periods from the time when registry operators announced its Sunrise period until the Sunrise Period launch. ---
>  
> I remember information coming out of the Data Analysis report that concluded that this time period was often too short to build awareness of the Sunrise. This data could lead the larger RPM group to recommend timing guideline be put in place (or not, but it would be beneficial for us to know).
>  
> Let me know what you think.
>  
> Kurt
>  
>  
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] FOR REVIEW/DISCUSSION: Updated list of questions
> From: "Mary Wong" <mary.wong at icann.org>
> Date: 9/5/16 1:29 am
> To: "gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> Staff has updated the list of questions to registries, registrars, providers and others following the discussion on the Sub Team call this past Friday. As agreed, please send any follow up questions, comments or suggestions to this list BEFORE the call this coming Friday so that they can be discussed on the call. As also agreed, the call this Friday will focus on those questions, comments and suggestions based on the latest changes as well as any additional subsequent ones only, all preferably sent to the list beforehand.
>  
> Staff will be reaching out to Bret Fausett to follow up on his comments made during the WG meeting in Helsinki, and will report back as soon as we hear from him.
>  
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>  
>  
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160909/d688cfef/attachment.html>