[Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing

Fri Sep 16 15:01:54 UTC 2016

David,
* Please find attached the Document with just the Questions in it. I have
added my thoughts to it for the consideration of the team-Thanx;

Kristine,

Your additions in the document are very specific and thoughtful. I was able
to frame some of mine on top of them.

W.r.t. Susan¹s point, I think it the reply was in a rush. Lets appreciate
that Kathy¹s point of getting confused is absolutely valid. I did get
confused too. So I decided to stick to just one Document for more clarity
and to my understanding, that¹s exactly what Kathy is saying.
On Wednessday call, some of the Charter Questions itself are in discussion
and the summary mail later as discussion points has been able to un-clutter
some. 

Then we refer to the scope of the TMCH, there is a focus to be maintained.
Infact, in the document above, (For e.g.) I requesting the team to assist me
in understanding that why we cannot look at the way TMCH contract is given
to Deloitte and IBM and not to other competitive service providers. Yes
though it will have a direct impact on expanding the scope of the services
provided, but I don¹t think that this may be discussed here.
At this point, for the sake of clarity, Since Kurt has compiled these
documents, If he reworks, and shares Only One (Probably this one) then it
will be easer to cut on the TAT on the topic and deliver.

Adding to this, My Apologies to the team, after a tiring golf session, in
the heat, I have to step out for a meeting with guest from abroad.  So won¹t
be able to make it to the call today.
Have a great weekend team. And I will catch up on the MP3. Will Miss you !

Regards,
-Vaibhav Aggarwal

From:  <gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Dorrain, Kristine via
Gnso-rpm-tmch" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
Reply-To:  "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink at amazon.com>
Date:  Friday, September 16, 2016 at 8:03 PM
To:  Susan Payne <susan.payne at valideus.com>
Cc:  "gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing

Agree, Susan! 

The original issue we raised was that we were finalizing a question list
without making sure we grabbed all the low hanging fruit. All we did was use
the charter questions to add more questions to the question list. It will
reduce the number of times we need to return to the TMCH, the registries,
and registrars. I have no idea how adding more questions on the same topics
is outside the scope.

Kristine

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:25 AM, Susan Payne <susan.payne at valideus.com> wrote:

> With the greatest of respect Kathy, we are not at all outside of scope.  This
> is what was agreed on the last call that we would do.  We discussed last week
> the work Kristine and I had done looking at the charter question specifically
> to try to identify where they gave rise additional questions that we should
> ask the various groups  registries, registrars, DPML providers and the TMCH.
> As agreed on the call, Kristine, Kurt and I then revisited this during the
> course of this week to tidy-up those additional questions and add them to the
> list of questions this group was already working on (making sure not to
> duplicate something already there).  That is the document Kurt has circulated.
> As he said, it is probably easier for everyone to read the clean copy with the
> comments rather than the composite redline (which gets very busy), but either
> could be used.  The fourth document  the charter questions themselves with
> the questions they gave rise to  is only there so that anyone who wants
> transparency of our process can have it, we don¹t need to look at this if you
> do not want to.
>  
> 
> Susan Payne
> Head of Legal Policy| Valideus Ltd
> 
> E: susan.payne at valideus.com <mailto:susan.payne at valideus.com>
> D: +44 20 7421 8255
> T: +44 20 7421 8299
> M: +44 7971 661175
>  
> Please note I will be on holiday from 19 September, returning 3 October 2016
>  
> 
> From:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
> Sent: 16 September 2016 15:15
> To: gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing
>  
> Quick note to the subgroup that I believe we are operating far beyond our
> scope, and far beyond our timeframe.
> 
> David, could you kindly recirculate our document of the publicly-available
> data and the report generated by you and Mary?
> 
> Tx, Kathy
> 
>  
> 
> On 9/16/2016 10:12 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> I'm sorry Kurt, but I have to object. I appreciate the work, but I don't
>> understand the difference between the four documents I am looking at and I
>> don't have time to cross-compare. I will have to revert back to the last
>> version circulated by Staff.
>> 
>> Best, Kathy
>> 
>> On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, kurt at kjpritz.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Everyone:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators,
>>> registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions developed by
>>> Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three forms:
>>> * redlines to the last version of the question list that show:
>>>> * new questions from the charter review,
>>>> * a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern,
>>>> * a few grammatical edits
>>>> * new comments
>>> * a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining
>>> * a clean version.
>>> During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines
>>> accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were developed from
>>> the review of the charter so that you can see the sources of the new
>>> questions.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I hope you find this helpful.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you Susan and Kristine.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Kurt
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
>>> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
>> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160916/af1940f3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TMCH Sub Team list of questions - updated 15 Sept(comments)[1].docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 45571 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160916/af1940f3/TMCHSubTeamlistofquestions-updated15Septcomments1-0001.docx>