[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from Working Group meeting of 27 July and a straw poll (for Members only)
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Wed Aug 3 15:43:55 UTC 2016
Hi Mary and All,
I would recommend that any Survey Monkey questionnaire that we circulate
to one constituency or stakeholder group be circulated to all GNSO
constituencies and stakeholder groups.
Best, Kathy (Kleiman)
On 8/1/2016 5:24 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
> Dear Working Group Members,
>
> Here are the Action Items from the Working Group meeting of 27 July
> 2016, as well as a note on their status and a link to a Doodle poll
> that we hope you will fill in at your earliest convenience (with
> reference to Action Item #1).
>
> */1./*Staff to create and circulate a Doodle poll _seeking Members’
> views on whether to continue discussing the standard of proof issue at
> this stage of deliberations on the TM-PDDRP, and on adding voluntary
> online mediation as an option_ to the TM-PDDRP (with details to be
> further worked out) – DONE. *//*
>
> */Note: /**/Please fill out this Doodle poll if you are a Member of
> the Working Group: /**/http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm. /**//*
>
> //
>
> 2.Staff to work with Brian Winterfeldt to draft _follow-up questions
> for the TM-PDDRP Providers on joint complaints/consolidation_, based
> on what has been discussed by the Working Group to date – IN PROCESS
>
> 3.Staff to inform the GNSO Council that, having done a straw poll of
> the WG membership, the co-chairs’ consensus view is that there is _no
> need for the WG to conduct a face-to-face session at ICANN57_ and that
> it might be more appropriate to have such a session at ICANN58 and/or
> ICANN59 – DONE.
>
> 4.Staff to _work with the TMCH Sub Team_ to see if a revised timeline
> for delivery of their work output is needed (based on the discussion
> with the Analysis Group on 29 July) – IN PROCESS.
>
> 5.Staff to develop a _Survey Monkey questionnaire_ – to be circulated
> to the IPC (and possibly the BC, per a suggestion from a co-chair
> following the Working Group meeting) – to seek information about
> whether there may have been a “substantial pattern or practice” of
> infringing behavior at the second level by new gTLD registry operators
> – QUESTIONS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW BY CO-CHAIRS.
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Senior Policy Director
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160803/28eb562e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg
mailing list