[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from Working Group meeting of 27 July and a straw poll (for Members only)

[theo geurts]

+1 Kathy.

Theo

On 3-8-2016 17:43, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> Hi Mary and All,
>
> I would recommend that any Survey Monkey questionnaire that we 
> circulate to one constituency or stakeholder group be circulated to 
> all GNSO constituencies and stakeholder groups.
>
> Best, Kathy (Kleiman)
>
> On 8/1/2016 5:24 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>>
>> Dear Working Group Members,
>>
>> Here are the Action Items from the Working Group meeting of 27 July 
>> 2016, as well as a note on their status and a link to a Doodle poll 
>> that we hope you will fill in at your earliest convenience (with 
>> reference to Action Item #1).
>>
>> */1./*Staff to create and circulate a Doodle poll _seeking Members’ 
>> views on whether to continue discussing the standard of proof issue 
>> at this stage of deliberations on the TM-PDDRP, and on adding 
>> voluntary online mediation as an option_ to the TM-PDDRP (with 
>> details to be further worked out) – DONE. *//*
>>
>> */Note: /**/Please fill out this Doodle poll if you are a Member of 
>> the Working Group: /**/http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm. /**//*
>>
>> //
>>
>> 2.Staff to work with Brian Winterfeldt to draft _follow-up questions 
>> for the TM-PDDRP Providers on joint complaints/consolidation_, based 
>> on what has been discussed by the Working Group to date – IN PROCESS
>>
>> 3.Staff to inform the GNSO Council that, having done a straw poll of 
>> the WG membership, the co-chairs’ consensus view is that there is _no 
>> need for the WG to conduct a face-to-face session at ICANN57_ and 
>> that it might be more appropriate to have such a session at ICANN58 
>> and/or ICANN59 – DONE.
>>
>> 4.Staff to _work with the TMCH Sub Team_ to see if a revised timeline 
>> for delivery of their work output is needed (based on the discussion 
>> with the Analysis Group on 29 July) – IN PROCESS.
>>
>> 5.Staff to develop a _Survey Monkey questionnaire_ – to be circulated 
>> to the IPC (and possibly the BC, per a suggestion from a co-chair 
>> following the Working Group meeting) – to seek information about 
>> whether there may have been a “substantial pattern or practice” of 
>> infringing behavior at the second level by new gTLD registry 
>> operators – QUESTIONS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW BY CO-CHAIRS.
>>
>> Thanks and cheers
>>
>> Mary
>>
>> Mary Wong
>>
>> Senior Policy Director
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>
>> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160803/949b5fb8/attachment.html>