[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from Working Group meeting of 27 July and a straw poll (for Members only)

[Salvador Camacho Hernández]

+1 Kathy

2016-08-03 10:43 GMT-05:00 Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>:

> Hi Mary and All,
>
> I would recommend that any Survey Monkey questionnaire that we circulate
> to one constituency or stakeholder group be circulated to all GNSO
> constituencies and stakeholder groups.
>
> Best, Kathy (Kleiman)
> On 8/1/2016 5:24 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
> Dear Working Group Members,
>
>
>
> Here are the Action Items from the Working Group meeting of 27 July 2016,
> as well as a note on their status and a link to a Doodle poll that we hope
> you will fill in at your earliest convenience (with reference to Action
> Item #1).
>
>
>
> *1.       *Staff to create and circulate a Doodle poll *seeking Members’
> views on whether to continue discussing the standard of proof issue at this
> stage of deliberations on the TM-PDDRP, and on adding voluntary online
> mediation as an option* to the TM-PDDRP (with details to be further
> worked out) – DONE.
>
> *Note: **Please fill out this Doodle poll if you are a Member of the
> Working Group: **http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm
> <http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm>. *
>
>
>
> 2.       Staff to work with Brian Winterfeldt to draft *follow-up
> questions for the TM-PDDRP Providers on joint complaints/consolidation*,
> based on what has been discussed by the Working Group to date – IN PROCESS
>
>
>
> 3.       Staff to inform the GNSO Council that, having done a straw poll
> of the WG membership, the co-chairs’ consensus view is that there is *no
> need for the WG to conduct a face-to-face session at ICANN57* and that it
> might be more appropriate to have such a session at ICANN58 and/or ICANN59
> – DONE.
>
>
>
> 4.       Staff to *work with the TMCH Sub Team* to see if a revised
> timeline for delivery of their work output is needed (based on the
> discussion with the Analysis Group on 29 July) – IN PROCESS.
>
>
>
> 5.       Staff to develop a *Survey Monkey questionnaire* – to be
> circulated to the IPC (and possibly the BC, per a suggestion from a
> co-chair following the Working Group meeting) – to seek information about
> whether there may have been a “substantial pattern or practice” of
> infringing behavior at the second level by new gTLD registry operators –
> QUESTIONS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW BY CO-CHAIRS.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
>
>
>
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Senior Policy Director
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing listgnso-rpm-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>



-- 
Salvador Camacho Hernández
Domain Names Consultant
Mail: salvador at proteccion.digital
Twitter: @SCH_IP <https://twitter.com/SCH_IP>
Websites: proteccion.digital
                 nombresdedominio.guru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160803/5429e3f4/attachment-0001.html>