[gnso-rpm-wg] GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI
Graham Schreiber
grahamschreiber at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 17:32:41 UTC 2016
Hi Brian & RPM WG: Cc ADR Forum:
Brain, having now indulged you're love of art, dining and world travel, on
the fees ICANN derives from the lowly .COM Domain Name Registrants, to go
globetrotting, perhaps you'll tell the Domain Name Registrants
participating in this forum why under You're direction & management, You'd
have Steptoe LLP inform a Virginia Court that CentralNic's portfolio of
FAKE cc.COMs are: extraterritorial to the Lanham Act?
Why too would you simultaneously inform the Court that Network Solutions
aren't violating their Contract to / with Domain Name Registrants, when
they re-sell { Infringe ~ Dilute & Blur .COM with uk.com ~ eu.COM etc }
with their own retail client ~ CentralNic's uk.COM Domain Name.
Informed as I well know you to be, how is the conduct of both you're
clients, not Contributory Infringement, Dilution & Blurring; and also
Racketeering?
Perhaps in you're capacity as IPC / TM.com Defendant, here in this group {
which you should resign from } to be an active Ry/rSG participant ~ explain
why Francis Gurry opted to discharge CentralNic as a client, not so very
long ago?
The 2nd Part of the question to you, also asks of / includes the
"Individual" from the ADR Forum this: Why I, as a Domain Name Registrant
must "mediate" with another Domain Name Registrant, who's entire business
practice is that of "Inducing" Infringement via SUB.COM Domain's?
The ADR Forum should know that when CentralNic "registered" uk.COM with
NSI, TLD Registrar Solutions & Demys that their obliged to the same ICANN
.COM / RAA rules as all others! Specifically, 3.7.7.9.
Is the ADR Forum unaware that being the: solution or remedy to a problem
created by the person who contracts them, CentralNic, in the fist degree ~
to solve the problem they created, becoming apparent to the Complainant,
through the 2nd Degree, not then actively engaging in Racketeering?
To all the other participants in this RPM-WG, I presume / reasonably
expect, that you'd all know the .COM is subject to VaED Laws. Given that
New Zealander & ICANN'er Mr. Kumar cautions NZ Citizens {and others too} to
be aware of their exposure to USA Law, via .COM use.
>
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/have-com-web-address-know-legal-risks-ck-113355
I'd encourage all the American Attorneys in the group to read SCOTUS
14-1480's "Questions Presented" because above all others, it's You're
American Law & American Consumers being "dotCONNED".
Stop being scammed by CentralNic; and stop letting them e~VaED proper USA
law. Unless, being the clever con-artists CentralNic are, the've got You
Americans charmed, so much so, that the USA has surrender sovereignty to
... The British Empire?!
SCOTUS 14-1480.
https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdf2jYqskzZEs.pdf
In closing, lets remember that under US Common Law, our Marks, Trade Names
& Trade Marks are protected in Cyberspace ~ 1st in Use ~ and also that the
"NEW gTLDs" are a contracted dimension in Cyberspace, from the NTIA, for
ICANN to build and manage in the DNS.
Therefore .... the Trademark Clearing House is also an ICANN racket, as our
.COMs = Madrid System equivalent Marks, Trade Names & Trademarks in
Cyberspace = In Use, in / with .COM, which mean the default "clearing
house" should be the .COM availability list.
Regards to all.
Graham Schreiber.
416.803.4678.
<><><><><><><>
[comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13]
------------------------------
<<< Chronological Index
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/index.html#00000>
>>>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg00001.html>
Thread Index
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/threads.html#00000>
>>>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg00001.html>
------------------------------
ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ??
- *To*: comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13 at xxxxxxxxx
- *Subject*: ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ??
- *From*: Graham Schreiber <graham_schreiber at xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- *Date*: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:56:33 -0400
------------------------------
Hello ICANN: cc: NTIA, DoC, Jones Day, WIPO, Garth Bruen & Senator
Leahy. [[ 4CCA & VAED - for good measure! ]]
ICANN, c/o Jones Day: In accordance with your Clients affirmation:
"Whereas, ICANN is committed to operating in an open and transparent manner"
and my Civil Lawsuit # 13-1812, against your client, for failing to enforce the
RAA Sections 3.7.7.3 an 3.7.7.9 ~ I wish to have you oblige my request by
furnishing the "agreement(s) between CentralNic and ICANN ..." that WIPO is
talking about, just below.
For the thoughtful consideration of parties outside ICANN, I'd like to
illustrate that other Companies have been "victimized" by CentralNic's
"Contributory Infringement" and False Designation ccTLDs, which beyond flaccid
ICANN Rules, are directly violating a United States Law # 15 USC § 1125 - False
designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden,
Those four (4) gigantic firms, who've been "fleeced" by WIPO for what amounts
to a "Racket" system, accepted by ICANN, to protect CentralNic are:
WIPO D2009-1741 Coke-a-Cola
WIPO D2013-0746 National Car Rental
WIPO D2011-1416 Oakley Glasses
WIPO D2012-0249 Zippo
>From Wikipedia: A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a
problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, will not be
affected, or would not otherwise exist. Particularly, the potential problem
may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may
be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this
party. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime)
As a USPTO "Registered" Trademark Holder, I fully anticipate my "Day in
Court" to be granted [ Details at 4CCA Case # 13-1812 ] so that I may bring
this injustice; and chronic harming too USPTO Brands to an end.
Further; and most critically, as catalyst to this information being made
public, it will help the United States Department of Justice, prevent further
"harm to American consumers" from occurring, which is their sole purpose.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Graham Schreiber, Pro Se.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian J. via gnso-rpm-wg <
gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> I am an intellectual property attorney and partner in a large
> international law firm (Mayer Brown LLP), and generally divide my time
> between our New York and Washington DC offices. My practice primarily
> focuses on domestic and international trademark law, Internet governance,
> and domain name matters including both brand protection and advising new
> gTLD registry operators (including of both .Brand and open generic new
> gTLDs). Our firm is an authorized Trademark Clearinghouse agent, and we
> frequently represent clients in a range of industries on internet related
> matters, including domain name disputes, such as the UDRP and various ccTLD
> domain dispute processes.
>
>
>
> I am a member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), for
> which I recently concluded a four year term as a GNSO Councilor, and have
> previously served as the IPC Treasurer. I currently also serve on the
> Board of Directors of the International Trademark Association (INTA), am a
> member of the project team for the 2016 INTA Annual Meeting, serve as
> special advisor for INTA’s Internet Committee and previously served four
> years as co-chair of INTA’s Trademark Administrators Committee Internet
> Project Team.
>
>
>
> I have authored and co-authored numerous articles in the fields of
> trademark law, domain name issues, and Internet governance, and speak
> frequently on these issues.
>
>
>
> My full professional biography can be found here
> <https://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Brian-Winterfeldt/>, and my ICANN
> Statement of Interest can be found here
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>.
>
>
>
> I very much look forward to working with you all in the context of this
> Working Group.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *Brian J. Winterfeldt*
>
> Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
>
> Mayer Brown LLP
>
> bwinterfeldt at mayerbrown.com
>
> 1999 K Street, NW
>
> Washington, DC 20006-1101
>
> 202.263.3284 direct dial
>
> 202.830.0330 fax
>
>
>
> 1221 Avenue of the Americas
>
> New York, New York 10020-1001
>
> 212.506.2345 direct dial
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy
> Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council
> to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been
> developed for all gTLDs!
>
> Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison,
> Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently
> anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already
> participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less
> familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be
> scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy
> Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines.
>
> In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and
> observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow
> George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your
> expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As
> with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will
> be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings.
>
> Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest -
> which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working
> Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest
> convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update
> an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of George
> Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>
>
> Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that
>
> this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
>
>
>
> (92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and
>
> some new ones too.
>
>
>
> As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take
>
> a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group
>
> participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a
>
> very productive PDP.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> George Kirikos
>
> 416-588-0269
>
> http://www.leap.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> (resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now
>
> appears to be working properly)
>
>
>
> I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this
>
> working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
>
>
>
> I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that >
>
> the interests of domain name registrants and due process are
>
> understood, represented, and reflected in the final
>
> analysis/recommendations.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> George Kirikos
>
> 416-588-0269
>
> http://www.leap.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
> received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are
> not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> e-mail.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160329/faae74c2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg
mailing list