[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items, Slides and Notes from the Working Group call held earlier today

Colin O'Brien colin at PartridgePartnersPC.com
Wed Apr 12 14:17:18 UTC 2017


+1 Georges

Colin Thomas Jefferson O’Brien

321 North Clark Street, Suite 720
Chicago, Illinois 60654
312-634-9503
http://www.partridge.partners/


-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nahitchevansky, Georges
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 7:09 AM
To: Paul Keating
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items, Slides and Notes from the Working Group call held earlier today

Actually it touches on the point here. If you are going to make various arguments of alleged abuse in support of claimed transparency, then it would it is relevant to know whether you are supporting a lack of transparency in the whois side of things where abuse has been rampant. While the TMCH and Whois are different animals a number of the arguments being made here to support transparency have actually been mirrored in the other context and rejected by those seeking opacity.  And one major difference between ‎the two situations is that there is widespread evidence of abuse of the whois system whereas here in the TMCH context you do not have evidence of a widespread abuse of the TMCH by brand owners. Nevertheless, you and others persist on wanting to conduct a fishing expedition under the guise of so called "transparency" to try and find some alleged widespread harm that simply does not exist. To many folks on the other side of the aisle, it appears that this is not about transparency but more about some effort to gut existing protections and to obtain the release of confidential information of brand owners as to what they did or did not register.   Perhaps this may not be the intent, but we all know that once that information is out the gaming will really begin. ‎Again, perhaps there are tweeks that could be made to improve the current system, but there is no real basis for undertaking the broad review that is being sought and certainly not for undoing the entire existing system.

‎
  Original Message
From: Paul Keating
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:33 PM
To: Nahitchevansky, Georges
Cc: J. Scott Evans; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: Action Items,	Slides and Notes from the Working Group call held earlier today

George,

You can always quote me. I say what I have said. I only ask that you quote me accurately. The discussion here is the TMCH database. Please let's stay on topic. 

Happy to discuss Whois separately. 


Sent from my iPad

> On 12 Apr 2017, at 00:18, Nahitchevansky, Georges <ghn at kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
> 
> Can I quote you in this on having an open and robust whois so we can 
> have across the board actual and real information on the parties 
> registering domain names and know who the bad actors are
> 
> Georges Nahitchevansky
> Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
> The Grace Building | 1114 Avenue of the Americas | New York, NY 
> 10036-7703 office 212 775 8720 | fax 212 775 8820 
> ghn at kilpatricktownsend.com | www.kilpatricktownsend.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:58 PM
> To: J. Scott Evans
> Cc: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items, Slides and Notes from the 
> Working Group call held earlier today
> 
> It says at most which domains it wants pre-emptiness and notice rights over.
> 
> Hardly a confidential business secret. The information is a public record. And, After all the Information is instantly public the minute one pre-emptive sunrise registration is undertaken. The notice right is completely a non secret.
> 
> And hardly sufficient to use to hide bad actors.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On 11 Apr 2017, at 23:18, J. Scott Evans via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> There is a big difference from a database that contains all a company’s registered marks and one that contains a culling for only those it deems most valuable for protection in the DNS. The former is clearly open for the public, the later is not.
>> 
>> J. Scott
>> 
>> 
>> J. Scott Evans
>> 408.536.5336 (tel)
>> 345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544
>> Director, Associate General Counsel
>> 408.709.6162 (cell)
>> San Jose, CA, 95110, USA
>> Adobe. Make It an Experience.
>> jsevans at adobe.com
>> www.adobe.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/11/17, 2:03 PM, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Jeremy Malcolm" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 11/4/17 9:43 am, J. Scott Evans via gnso-rpm-wg wrote:
>>> George:
>>> 
>>> We have all followed this string. We understand that you and a few others believe there need to be wholesale changes to the Sunrise mechanism and the TMCH database (or at least the confidentiality of that data).
>>> 
>>> 1. Do you have a suggestion for how to improve the Sunrise mechanism?
>>> 2. I see very little support for violating the confidentiality provisions of the TMCH contract.
>> 
>> FWIW I am also all for bringing the transparency of the TMCH database 
>> into line with those of national trademark registries so that its 
>> secrecy does not facilitate the kinds of abuses that George has 
>> uncovered. I have been an observer until now but I've just upgraded 
>> to member and plan to join the call tomorrow.
>> 
>> --
>> Jeremy Malcolm
>> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feff.
>> org&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2528000b02f744c8d69a08d4811e3b81%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
>> 438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275414221363260&sdata=FLU88IUnUq0DT
>> ixWIhDAELHUtjhYZgxqHGr8ihACkQ8%3D&reserved=0
>> jmalcolm at eff.org
>> 
>> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>> 
>> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>> 
>> Public key: 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>> eff.org%2Ffiles%2F2016%2F11%2F27%2Fkey_jmalcolm.txt&data=02%7C01%7C%7
>> C2528000b02f744c8d69a08d4811e3b81%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%
>> 7C0%7C0%7C636275414221373268&sdata=GzYW9x04IhxeW3HTyWRedWTpbiQQOrfZff
>> lAKXdh04M%3D&reserved=0 PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 
>> 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> ***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list