[gnso-rpm-wg] Agenda and documents for Working Group call this week

[Paul Keating]

Jonathan wrote:  

"Since the TMCH is a very important protection rights protection mechanism, available to brand owners, and in most countries of the world, the general view is that GIs are a type of trademarks, I make the following alternative proposal:"


Prk comment.     

Not to pester a point but when we were arguing to make the TMCH public Or as an alternative to allow this WG to access certain parts of it we were told the opposite. 

Sincerely,
Paul Keating, Esq.

> On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Jonathan Agmon <jonathan.agmon at ip-law.legal> wrote:
> 
> Since the TMCH is a very important protection rights protection mechanism, available to brand owners, and in most countries of the world, the general view is that GIs are a type of trademarks, I make the following alternative proposal:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170429/8693fb84/attachment.html>