[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Draft collated proposal for Sunrise-related data collection
J. Scott Evans
jsevans at adobe.com
Wed Aug 9 19:46:40 UTC 2017
That was in personal opinion. If you'd like to continue debating this issue, feel free.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 2:34 PM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:18 PM, J. Scott Evans <jsevans at adobe.com> wrote:
>> I personally believe that a continued discussion of the continuance of Sunrise Registrations is fruitless. As I recall our call on August 2nd, I believe we had solid consensus that the solution is to fix the loopholes in the current system, not eliminate the current system altogether. I realize that Jeremy and George have a viewpoint, but that viewpoint is not reflective of our discussions. I suggest we move on to more productive topics.
> Personal beliefs aside, is that an "official" request as a co-chair? I
> don't believe Jeremy has indicated that he has withdrawn his proposal,
> nor has there been any formal "consensus vote" on this topic, as per
> my understanding of PDP requirements. Indeed, making such a
> determination would be premature, given data collection and analysis
> is incomplete. Thus, as an active and open PDP question/proposal to be
> answered by the working group, it seems to me that it's as valid a
> topic for discussion as any other undecided and open topic.
> If some folks can't be swayed by any amount of evidence, or "know" the
> outcome in advance, I'd love to see them attempt to justify it in the
> PDP final report, as it would only invite a "minority report."
> "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what
> you know for sure that just ain't so." -- Mark Twain
> It seems ICANN policy is often based on the 2nd sentence of that
> quote, ignoring attempts at evidence-based policymaking.
> George Kirikos
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg