[gnso-rpm-wg] Follow up from WG call this week
Paul at law.es
Mon Jan 9 13:07:54 UTC 2017
Why not ensure that the survey is being sent to the providers as well?
From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Mathieu Weill
<mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
Date: Monday, January 9, 2017 at 12:44 PM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Follow up from WG call this week
> Dear Mary, Dear Colleagues,
> Thanks for putting together the survey. I believe this may somewhat help
> collect more responses, but would like to reiterate a comment I made in the
> chat (although it got no traction at the time, but my audio was limited)
> during the last call.
> My organization, Afnic, is one of the few who submitted a response to the
> survey so far. We did it on behalf of one of our clients, the City of Paris. I
> have significant concerns about reaching out directly to registries, for the
> following reasons :
> - The questions are extremely technical, and most of our clients
> would be completely lost
> - There is no clear benefit for registries to invest time in
> answering this survey. The TMCH is often ³dealt with² by a partner / provider.
> I understand the need to collect data from registries, but would suggest
> either of two options :
> 1) Consider that the low level of responses is an information in itself,
> and leave it at that.
> 2) Reach out to registry service providers rather than registries to
> collect more meaningful data.
> Just my two cents as a respondent to the survey.
> De : gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] De
> la part de Mary Wong
> Envoyé : vendredi 6 janvier 2017 23:08
> À : gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Objet : [gnso-rpm-wg] Follow up from WG call this week
> Dear all,
> As requested during the Working Group call held earlier this week, staff has
> put all the questions that were sent to the Registries Stakeholder Group by
> the TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team into a survey format. You can preview and
> test it here:
> Please note that while we have retained almost all of the text of the original
> questions, in a few places we have rearranged their order or converted a
> question into a statement inviting comment. However, we do not believe we have
> changed any of the scope or intent of the questions, and we have not otherwise
> edited, deleted or added any questions.
> Also as agreed on the call, staff will work with the co-chairs to transmit
> this survey to specific registry operators (especially those offering blocking
> mechanism services who have not yet responded to the original solicitation for
> feedback) and via the registry members of this Working Group.
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
> _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg