[gnso-rpm-wg] PLEASE CONSIDER A REPLY: Proposed Working Group call next week

Thu Jan 19 18:50:04 UTC 2017

Decisions should never be made without opportunity for feedback from the
mail list.  There are relatively few people ever on a call, compared to the
number of people on this list.

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
wrote:

> If I may follow up, an additional benefit of not making decisions on a
> single call is that it makes it easier for participants who may have
> difficulties expressing their views during a meeting (because of a lack of
> confidence in their English speaking abilities for instance) to submit
> inputs in writing in between meetings.
>
> Best
> Mathieu
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org]
> De la part de Paul Keating
> Envoyé : jeudi 19 janvier 2017 14:11
> À : Susan Payne; George Kirikos; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Objet : Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] PLEASE CONSIDER A REPLY: Proposed Working Group
> call next week
>
> For what its worth, my 2 Cents:
>
> We created the different timing for the call (which I supported and
> continue to support).  However, I would like to see some indication of the
> number of people on those calls.  This is not with the idea of cancelling
> them.  Rather, we might want to adopt a policy of NOT reaching definitive
> decisions on EITHER of the calls (Asia vs non-Asia) so that those unable
> to participate in either can have input prior to making group decisions.
> The alternative would be to solicit group email comments on specific
> points pending decision.  I realize this may make things more complicated
> but it has the attraction of ensuring maximum participation formulating
> consensus-driven decisions.
>
> Paul
>
> On 1/19/17, 11:09 AM, "Susan Payne" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on
> behalf of susan.payne at valideus.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi George - I think that was my comment so thanks for pointing that out.
> >I did not recall the cancellation for INTA but with that in mind if a
> >similar large number of people would be missing the call for NamesCon I
> >agree it seems reasonable to cancel.  I do think it does depend on the
> >volume of participants for whom the event is a factor (regardless of
> >which event it happens to be).  In this case we need to take into
> >account that this is the call scheduled to be more convenient for those
> >in AsPac timezones, who maybe won't be going to NamesCon (I have no
> >idea whether they will or not).  The conflict equally doesn't affect me
> >since I can't join a call at 4am, so my absence from the call has
> >nothing to do with NamesCon.
> >
> >Susan Payne
> >Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
> >
> >E: susan.payne at valideus.com
> >D: +44 20 7421 8255
> >T: +44 20 7421 8299
> >M: +44 7971 661175
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
> >[mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of George Kirikos
> >Sent: 19 January 2017 00:50
> >To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> >Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] PLEASE CONSIDER A REPLY: Proposed Working
> >Group call next week
> >
> >During today's call, some folks felt that the call scheduled for next
> >week should still be held, despite some folks being unable due to their
> >attendance at the large NamesCon event, as "there are always some folks
> >who can't make it." However, I'd like to remind people that back in May
> >2016 we cancelled a working group call due to INTA having their Orlando
> >meeting:
> >
> >http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-May/000291.html
> >
> >So, it would only be fair, in my opinion, that next week's call be
> >cancelled. [the conflict doesn't affect me personally, by the way; I
> >can make it next week]
> >
> >If it's not cancelled, then the next time there's a conflict with an
> >INTA meeting, we should not change our own schedule to accommodate
> >those going to INTA events.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >George Kirikos
> >416-588-0269
> >http://www.leap.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:
> >> I will also be at NamesCon.
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On 18 Jan 2017, at 21:23, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Members,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Those Members who were present at the Working Group meeting held
> >>earlier today agreed to go ahead with the meeting scheduled for next
> >>Wednesday. In view, however, of the fact that quite a few Members will
> >>be traveling to NamesCon at that time, coupled with its being the
> >>first meeting time that is rotating to 0400 UTC, it will be helpful if
> >>we can get a sense of how many Members will not be able to attend the
> >>meeting.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> As such, please take a moment to reply to me if you know you will NOT
> >> be on the call next Wednesday at 0400 UTC  note that there¹s no need
> >> to Reply All or reply at all if you plan to be on the call.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Mary
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> >> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> >> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> >_______________________________________________
> >gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> >gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> >_______________________________________________
> >gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> >gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170119/68c06fb4/attachment.html>