[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

Kathy Kleiman kathy at kathykleiman.com
Wed Mar 29 15:14:20 UTC 2017


I have yet to review this material, but I have been reaching out to STI 
Members. When the TMCH Database left the STI, GNSO Council, and ICANN 
Board acceptance it was an open database.

I think we have an interesting issue to review.

Best, Kathy


On 3/29/2017 10:17 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> If it will help, the need to maintain the confidentiality of the TMCH 
> Database (TMDB) was discussed by the Implementation Assistance Group 
> (IAG), working between October 2011 and May 2012 and consisting of 
> community volunteers. The IAG was convened to develop and recommend 
> business requirements around specific issues in the provision of 
> Sunrise and Claims Notification services through the TMCH.
>
> The attached document excerpts some text from the IAG’s final report 
> that seems to indicate that the IAG considered the question as to 
> whether and why the TMDB was to be a confidential database. Please 
> note that staff is providing this text purely for informational 
> purposes, and takes no position as to whether or not the TMDB should 
> continue to remain confidential.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mary
>
> *From: *<gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Paul Keating 
> <Paul at law.es>
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 23:08
> *To: *"J. Scott Evans" <jsevans at adobe.com>
> *Cc: *"gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>, Michael 
> Karanicolas <michael at law-democracy.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark 
> scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services
>
> I've not yet seen any such articulated reasons.  Care to provide them?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:40, J. Scott Evans <jsevans at adobe.com 
> <mailto:jsevans at adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>     Paul:
>
>     I think the proponents of the closed database have repeatedly
>     articulated the benefits they see in a closed database. That is
>     the status quo. In order to change the status quo, it is the
>     proponents for an open system that need to articulate
>     (persuasively) an overriding need or benefit for such a change.
>
>     J. Scott
>
>     <image001.gif>
>
>     	
>
>     *J. Scott Evans*
>
>     	
>
>     408.536.5336 (tel)
>
>     	
>
>     345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544
>
>     Director, Associate General Counsel
>
>     	
>
>     408.709.6162 (cell)
>
>     	
>
>     San Jose, CA, 95110, USA
>
>     Adobe. Make It an Experience.
>
>     	
>
>     jsevans at adobe.com <mailto:jsevans at adobe.com>
>
>     	
>
>     www.adobe.com[adobe.com]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adobe.com&d=DwMCaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=xzS0_a7gh_CbP93HDCn4gCiEPf61PKMba02eWelzxC0&s=QGu3yeTOdbOcCfjnVYkndyNSP8JSD3FM3-F3Icw1jYE&e=>
>
>     	
>
>     *From: *<gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Paul Keating
>     <paul at law.es <mailto:paul at law.es>>
>     *Date: *Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM
>     *To: *Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be
>     <mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>>
>     *Cc: *"gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>"
>     <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>, Michael
>     Karanicolas <michael at law-democracy.org
>     <mailto:michael at law-democracy.org>>
>     *Subject: *Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from
>     trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services
>
>     Question.
>
>             solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
>
>
>             mitigated by having the database be closed
>
>     Can someone please list the issues and concerns at issue here?
>
>     And, how has closing the database mitigated any of them?
>
>     Sent from my iPad
>
>
>     On 28 Mar 2017, at 21:07, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be
>     <mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>> wrote:
>
>                 solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
>
>                 mitigated by having the database be closed
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170329/bcd846ad/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list