[gnso-rpm-wg] Agenda and documents for RPM Working Group call this Wednesday

[Jonathan Agmon]

Sorry, I will not be able to join later today.
As to GIs I support Claudio’s proposal to have a sub-team review of the various forms of registration/protection for GIs and recommend which ones should go into a database and reach a clear and balanced solution for this type of strings.

Wishing those on the Group that celebrate a very happy Shavuot,

Jonathan




[cid:SANLogSmallNew_485a3de7-c8c5-4ec6-b34d-6de68607f295.png]

Jonathan Agmon (胡韩森)

Advocate, Director

Attorney and Counsellor at Law (admitted in New York)

jonathan.agmon at ip-law.legal<mailto:jonathan.agmon at ip-law.legal>

www.ip-law.legal<http://www.ip-law.legal>


T SG +65 6532 2577

T US +1 212 999 6180

T IL +972 9 950 7000

F IL +972 9 950 5500


Soroker Agmon Nordman Pte Ltd.

133 New Bridge Road, #13-02, 059413 SINGAPORE

8 Hahoshlim Street P.O. Box 12425 4672408 Herzliya, ISRAEL


This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Please send us by fax any message containing deadlines as incoming e-mails are not screened for response deadlines. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.


From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 12:18 AM
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Agenda and documents for RPM Working Group call this Wednesday

Dear all,

The proposed agenda, and relevant accompanying documents, for the next Working Group call, scheduled for this coming Wednesday 31 May, is as follows:


 1.  Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest
 2.  Review/discussion of proposed refined Charter questions from Trademark Claims Sub Team (see attached document)
 3.  Review/discussion of proposed Private Protections questions from the WG co-chairs (see attached document)
 4.  Agree on next steps for open TMCH questions (design marks, GIs, expanding the identical match standard) – e.g. an online survey to poll WG members on the level of support for the various proposals put forward to date or other mechanism to gauge support?
 5.  Next steps/next meeting

Thanks and cheers
Mary


************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170530/3dbce789/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SANLogSmallNew_485a3de7-c8c5-4ec6-b34d-6de68607f295.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7844 bytes
Desc: SANLogSmallNew_485a3de7-c8c5-4ec6-b34d-6de68607f295.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170530/3dbce789/SANLogSmallNew_485a3de7-c8c5-4ec6-b34d-6de68607f295-0001.png>