[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from 10 January Working Group Call

[Greg Shatan]

Agree with Hector and Brian.  We could use Google Docs so that we have a
single document, while still allowing the document itself to be edited.
This has worked well for a number of WGs and Subgroups.  Google Doc's
"suggest" function is similar to "track changes" and will allow readers to
zero in on the changes.

Greg

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Ariel Manoff <amanoff at vmf.com.ar> wrote:

> Thank you very much Mary and I agree with Brian.
>
>
>
> Hector
>
>
>
> *Héctor Ariel Manoff*
>
> *Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen*Viamonte 1145 10º Piso
> C1053ABW Buenos Aires
> República Argentina
> Te: (54-11) 4371-6100
> Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365
> E-mail: amanoff at vmf.com.ar
> Web: http://www.vmf.com.ar
>
> ************************************************************
> ************************************************************
> ****************************
>
> Esta comunicación tiene como destinatario a la persona o empresa a la cual
> está dirigida y puede contener información confidencial y reservada. Si el
> lector de este mensaje no es el destinatario o sus empleados o
> representantes, deberá proceder a reenviar el presente a su remitente. La
> distribución, diseminación o copiado de este mensaje podría constituir
> violación a la ley. Gracias.
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
> to recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone and return the original message to us at the above address. Thank
> you.
>
> ************************************************************
> ************************************************************
> ****************************
>
>
>
> *De:* gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] *En nombre de *BECKHAM,
> Brian
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 17 de enero de 2018 09:57
> *Para:* Mary Wong; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> *Asunto:* Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from 10 January Working Group
> Call
>
>
>
> Thanks Mary,
>
>
>
> Now that we’ve made progress on the high-level topics/questions in the far
> left column (as one example:  “C. THE RESPONSE: 1. Duration of response
> period 2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to
> Defenses), e.g. Default procedures”) presumably there will be an
> opportunity to provide more specific input on column 3 (Headed:  “Suggested
> New Questions as of ICANN60 and those added at the meetings on 03 January
> 2018 and on 10 January 2018”).
>
>
>
> To facilitate that, would it make sense to send this document around in
> Word format, for ease of editing and exchange amongst the WG (rather than
> taking up time on a call to wordsmith)?
>
>
>
> Thanks, and hope I’m more or less on the right page in terms of where we
> are headed.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 13, 2018 12:33 AM
> *To:* gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from 10 January Working Group
> Call
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> Following up from the first action item from the Working Group call this
> past Wednesday, please find attached the updated draft URS Discussion
> Document. The document includes the suggestions made on the call for which
> no objections were received; staff has included notes on these in the table
> to facilitate your review of the discussion. Staff continues to work on the
> “parking lot” document that will contain all other suggestions made after
> the ICANN60 sessions and will circulate that when it is ready. We hope that
> both documents, along with the session and call recordings and transcripts,
> will reflect the Working Group’s deliberations to date on scoping a review
> of the URS.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry
>
>
>
> *From: *gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 16:47
> *To: *"gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from 10 January Working Group Call
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The action items noted by staff from the Working Group call held on 10
> January 2018 are as follows:
>
>
>
> 1. Staff will update the Compilation of Current URS Discussion Documents
> based on the suggested edits from the 10 January meeting.
>
> 2. Staff will work with the Co-Chairs to develop a historical timeline for
> development of the URS in the New gTLD Program.
>
>
>
> Staff will post to the wiki space the action items and notes.  *Please
> note that these will be high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute
> for the transcript or recording.*  The recording, transcript, Adobe
> Connect chat, and attendance records are posted on the wiki.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180118/df6ad563/attachment-0001.html>