[gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions

[claudio di gangi]

Phil,

The first question concerns their respective Provider Rules, such as their
online filing systems and the submission of evidence.

The second is a question of general applicability.

Best regards,
Claudio



On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com>
wrote:

> Claudio—which section of the presentation does this relate to? Or is it
> miscellaneous?
>
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin
>
> Policy Counsel
>
> VeriSign, Inc.
>
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=12061+Bluemont+Way+%0D%0AReston,+VA+20190&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> 703-948-4648 <(703)%20948-4648>/Direct
>
> 571-342-7489 <(571)%20342-7489>/Cell
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *claudio
> di gangi
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:44 AM
> *To:* Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
> *Cc:* gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>; ICANN61-103A at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions
>
>
>
> Mary,
>
>
>
> I dialed-in a little late, so apologizes if these have already been asked.
>
>
>
> My questions are the following:
>
>
>
> 1. If a domain is used to further a phishing attack, do their online
> filing systems accept evidence of email abuse, such as the email header?
>
>
>
> 2. If the WG were to recommend the URS apply to legacy gTLDs (as a
> consensus policy), can the providers easily scale their services
> accordingly or would they anticipate challenges doing so?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Claudio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180315/6e31cb8b/attachment.html>