[gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions

Corwin, Philip pcorwin at verisign.com
Thu Mar 15 13:53:05 UTC 2018


OK, if you don’t mind please hold them for the last 10 minutes



Philip S. Corwin

Policy Counsel

VeriSign, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

703-948-4648/Direct

571-342-7489/Cell



"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



From: claudio di gangi [mailto:ipcdigangi at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:52 AM
To: Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com>
Cc: mary.wong at icann.org; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org; ICANN61-103A at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions



Phil,



The first question concerns their respective Provider Rules, such as their online filing systems and the submission of evidence.



The second is a question of general applicability.



Best regards,

Claudio







On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com<mailto:pcorwin at verisign.com>> wrote:

   Claudio—which section of the presentation does this relate to? Or is it miscellaneous?



   Philip S. Corwin

   Policy Counsel

   VeriSign, Inc.

   12061 Bluemont Way<https://maps.google.com/?q=12061+Bluemont+Way+%0D%0AReston,+VA+20190&entry=gmail&source=g>
   Reston, VA 20190

   703-948-4648<tel:(703)%20948-4648>/Direct

   571-342-7489<tel:(571)%20342-7489>/Cell



   "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



   From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of claudio di gangi
   Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:44 AM
   To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
   Cc: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>; ICANN61-103A at icann.org<mailto:ICANN61-103A at icann.org>
   Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions



   Mary,



   I dialed-in a little late, so apologizes if these have already been asked.



   My questions are the following:



   1. If a domain is used to further a phishing attack, do their online filing systems accept evidence of email abuse, such as the email header?



   2. If the WG were to recommend the URS apply to legacy gTLDs (as a consensus policy), can the providers easily scale their services accordingly or would they anticipate challenges doing so?



   Thanks!



   Best regards,

   Claudio



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180315/bf4722d0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list