[gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions
Corwin, Philip
pcorwin at verisign.com
Thu Mar 15 13:53:05 UTC 2018
OK, if you don’t mind please hold them for the last 10 minutes
Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
703-948-4648/Direct
571-342-7489/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: claudio di gangi [mailto:ipcdigangi at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:52 AM
To: Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com>
Cc: mary.wong at icann.org; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org; ICANN61-103A at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions
Phil,
The first question concerns their respective Provider Rules, such as their online filing systems and the submission of evidence.
The second is a question of general applicability.
Best regards,
Claudio
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com<mailto:pcorwin at verisign.com>> wrote:
Claudio—which section of the presentation does this relate to? Or is it miscellaneous?
Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way<https://maps.google.com/?q=12061+Bluemont+Way+%0D%0AReston,+VA+20190&entry=gmail&source=g>
Reston, VA 20190
703-948-4648<tel:(703)%20948-4648>/Direct
571-342-7489<tel:(571)%20342-7489>/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of claudio di gangi
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:44 AM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>; ICANN61-103A at icann.org<mailto:ICANN61-103A at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions
Mary,
I dialed-in a little late, so apologizes if these have already been asked.
My questions are the following:
1. If a domain is used to further a phishing attack, do their online filing systems accept evidence of email abuse, such as the email header?
2. If the WG were to recommend the URS apply to legacy gTLDs (as a consensus policy), can the providers easily scale their services accordingly or would they anticipate challenges doing so?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Claudio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180315/bf4722d0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg
mailing list