[gnso-rpm-wg] Dealing with unsatisfactory proposals

[Paul Tattersfield]

I was unable to attend last week’s call because a couple of other long
standing Wednesday meeting commitments, unfortunately it looks increasingly
likely I will unavoidable need to be elsewhere this week too and I have
serious concerns with some of the proposals. I reviewd the AC chat
recording from last week and I was very concerned to hear one of the
co-chairs say he [personally] believed a proposal from an Industry Group
should get an automatic entry into to initial report.

If I remember correctly we had a similar problem with the IGO/INGO draft
report where those driving the working group wouldn't listen and the
resulting public comment period wasn't kind. The working group then had to
waste a not inconsiderable amount of its time redrafting its report to
correct that fundamental error.

So what is the best way to ensure fundamentally flawed proposals are
considered more fully before there is any expectation they will meet the
initial report?

Yours sincerely,


Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20181009/925b7d5d/attachment.html>