[GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies
Volker Greimann
vgreimann at key-systems.net
Fri May 10 11:13:15 UTC 2019
It would also be very helpful if the Claims Notices could be generated
in advance of the actual registration, say: at the time a pre-order for
a domain is received.
To reduce concerns with regard to changes to the database between the
pre-order and the actual registration, it could be proposed that another
database check is required at the time of registration, but no new
notice would be required unless there is a change.
Best,
Volker
Am 09.05.2019 um 19:12 schrieb Corwin, Philip via GNSO-RPM-WG:
>
> Paul T:
>
> To clarify, are you proposing that Claims Notices should continue to
> be generated only in response to prospective registrations of domains
> where the name is an exact match for a TMCH-registered mark, but that
> the TMCH notification service should be expanded to provide the mark
> holder with notice whenever a domain name that includes the exact
> match is registered?
>
> Thanks, Philip
>
> Philip S. Corwin
>
> Policy Counsel
>
> VeriSign, Inc.
>
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> 703-948-4648/Direct
>
> 571-342-7489/Cell
>
> /"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey/
>
> *From:* GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Paul Tattersfield
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 09, 2019 12:27 PM
> *To:* BECKHAM, Brian <brian.beckham at wipo.int>
> *Cc:* gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims
> Notice Sub Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies
>
> Thanks for the link Brian, my question to Michael was really to see if
> the the issues for non-match domains could be met with jsut an email
> to the TM holder rather than a notice to every domain appliclicant
> with a TM substring in it.
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:17 PM BECKHAM, Brian <brian.beckham at wipo.int
> <mailto:brian.beckham at wipo.int>> wrote:
>
> Paul, and Paul,
>
> This is already provided by the TMCH:
>
> https://www.trademark-clearinghouse.com/content/ongoing-notifications
>
> Brian
>
> *From:* GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> *On Behalf Of *Paul Keating
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 9, 2019 12:47 PM
> *To:* Paul Tattersfield <gpmgroup at gmail.com
> <mailto:gpmgroup at gmail.com>>
> *Cc:* gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub
> Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies
>
> Excellent idea Paul!
>
> This is a service that the TMCH could easily implement. It would
> then allow the trademark holder to deal with the issue in a
> responsible manner instead of having a knee-jerk and chilling
> email sent to the registrant.
>
> Paul. Keating
>
> *From: *Paul Tattersfield <gpmgroup at gmail.com
> <mailto:gpmgroup at gmail.com>>
> *Date: *Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 1:48 AM
> *To: *Paul Keating <Paul at law.es <mailto:Paul at law.es>>
> *Cc: *"Michael Graham (ELCA)" <migraham at expediagroup.com
> <mailto:migraham at expediagroup.com>>, Julie Hedlund
> <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>,
> "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>"
> <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub
> Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Couple of quick questions
>
>
> Wouldn't single letter marks generate a lot of notices especially
> an 'a' or 'e' ?
>
> Would it be possible to just send a notfication email to the mark
> holder so they could remain informed of new registrations and be
> able to montior the new domains and thereby avoid the chilling
> effect of lots of TMCH notices to gwnuine registrants?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul.
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:14 PM Paul Keating <Paul at law.es
> <mailto:Paul at law.es>> wrote:
>
> With all respect to Michael, I do not believe this proposal
> should be accepted at this time.
>
> Questions 7 and 8 remain unanswered. These are important
> threshold questions that the proponent should complete prior
> to submission. Otherwise the work group is bogged down
> considering or perhaps even assisting in the development of
> basic rationale for the proposal. This should be undertaken
> by the proponent.
>
> Thus, here we have a proposal to significantly expand the
> scope of notification. It would, for example, trigger a
> notice for Apple Computers if I wanted to register Pineapple.
> xyz or a trademark holder for “THE” if I wanted to register
> Theater.club or for Nike if I wanted to register Airplane.xyz
>
> The proposal provides no evidence that would support the
> proposal (Question 7).
>
> Nor does it reference any data reviewed by the Sub Team that
> show any need to address the issue (Question 8).
>
> With a properly completed questionnaire this may become a
> legitimate request but it currently does not meet the
> requirements IMHO.
>
> Paul Keating
>
> *From: *GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of "Michael
> Graham (ELCA) via GNSO-RPM-WG" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
> *Reply-To: *"Michael Graham (ELCA)" <migraham at expediagroup.com
> <mailto:migraham at expediagroup.com>>
> *Date: *Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 5:40 PM
> *To: *Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org
> <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *[GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub
> Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies
>
> Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the call today due
> to pressing business matters. Because the schedule calls for
> discussion of answers and proposals regarding Question 4
> regarding whether the Exact Match standard for sending Claims
> Notices should be extended, and I wish to resubmit my “Exact
> Match Plus” proposal for either the Sub Team’s approval or
> approval for placing before the community for Public Comment,
> I am attaching my proposal – which I have revised to the form
> for submission of proposals. I have not completed the
> references to Evidence, and had hoped to do so in part today
> during our call. I shall, however, complete this if granted
> time to do so before our next call.
>
> Thank you all for your consideration and indulgence,
>
> Michael R.
>
> _______________________________________________ GNSO-RPM-WG
> mailing list GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> <mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org <mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
> World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This
> electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and
> copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail
> by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this
> e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail
> attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
--
Volker A. Greimann
General Counsel and Policy Manager
*KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*
T: +49 6894 9396901
M: +49 6894 9396851
F: +49 6894 9396851
W: www.key-systems.net
Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of
Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in
England and Wales with company number 8576358.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190510/34eafb3c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the GNSO-RPM-WG
mailing list