[GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC

Tue Feb 25 16:52:23 UTC 2020

Yes, that’s an improvement, thank you, and I would be agreeable with that.

Zak

Muscovitch Law P.C.
zak at muscovitch.com<mailto:zak at muscovitch.com>
1-866-654-7129
416-924-5084
http://www.trademarks-canada.com/
https://www.muscovitch.com/
https://dnattorney.com/

From: claudio di gangi <ipcdigangi at gmail.com>
Sent: February-25-20 11:50 AM
To: Zak Muscovitch <zak at muscovitch.com>
Cc: BECKHAM, Brian <brian.beckham at wipo.int>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC

Sounds like a run-on sentence to me.

Zak are you OK with this:

There was general support in the Working Group for publishing this proposal in the Initial Report to seek public comment, with some Working Group members supporting the proposal as drafted. However, some Working Group members expressed opposition, in terms of both substance and implementation, including the proposed remedies and the definitions of “repeat offender” and “high volume cybersquatting”.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:53 AM Zak Muscovitch <zak at muscovitch.com<mailto:zak at muscovitch.com>> wrote:
Sure, Brian.

Here is what I believe was the original text:

There was general support in the Working Group for publishing this proposal in the Initial Report to seek public comment. Some Working Group members expressed practical concerns about implementing the proposal.

And here is the proposed revised text:

While there was general support in the Working Group for publishing this proposal in the Initial Report to seek public comment, and some Working Group members were in favor of the Individual Proposal as drafted, some Working Group members expressed substantial and serious concerns with both the Individual Proposal’s proposed definition of “repeat offender” and of “high volume cybersquatting”, as well as the proposed new remedies, and indicated that they were opposed to the Individual Proposal in substance and had practical concerns about implementing the proposal.

Zak

Muscovitch Law P.C.
zak at muscovitch.com<mailto:zak at muscovitch.com>
1-866-654-7129
416-924-5084
http://www.trademarks-canada.com/
https://www.muscovitch.com/
https://dnattorney.com/

From: BECKHAM, Brian <brian.beckham at wipo.int<mailto:brian.beckham at wipo.int>>
Sent: February-25-20 10:42 AM
To: Zak Muscovitch <zak at muscovitch.com<mailto:zak at muscovitch.com>>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: RE: Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC

Thanks Zak for this proposal in advance of tomorrow’s meeting.

I wonder if you could confirm that I am reading this revised doc onscreen correctly.

It seems that you have added an introductory “While” (so instead of:  “There was…” it now reads:  “While there was…”) and then the clause “and some Working Group members were in favor of the Individual Proposal as drafted…”

If that’s right, these seem like unobjectionable clarifications.

If not, would you be able to point out the proposed added / deleted text.

There also seem to be a few missing connecting words towards the end (“and had”) so that it should read:  “…in substance [and had] practical concerns about implementing the proposal.”

Just checking, and thanks again!

Brian

From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Zak Muscovitch
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:24 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC

Just FYI, although I was loathe to propose revisions, I took another look at the “Working Group Deliberation” section with regards to Individual Proposal #15, and proposed in the Google Doc some revised language describing my sense of the WG’s deliberations on this issue, which I think were not entirely reflective of the WG’s deliberation in this instance.

New proposed wording:

Working Group Deliberation: While there was general support in the Working Group for publishing this proposal in the Initial Report to seek public comment, and some Working Group members were in favor of the Individual Proposal as drafted, some Working Group members expressed substantial and serious concerns with both the Individual Proposal’s proposed definition of “repeat offender” and of “high volume cybersquatting”, as well as the proposed new remedies and indicated that they were opposed to the Individual Proposal as drafted in substance.

Zak

Muscovitch Law P.C.
zak at muscovitch.com<mailto:zak at muscovitch.com>
1-866-654-7129
416-924-5084
http://www.trademarks-canada.com/
https://www.muscovitch.com/
https://dnattorney.com/

From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: February-24-20 1:26 PM
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC

Dear RPM WG members,

Please find the proposed agenda and materials below for the WG meeting on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 18:00-19:30 UTC.

As is the GNSO's practice, the document is being circulated for the purpose of ensuring that WG members are comfortable with the format and overall coverage of the recommendations and deliberations. Please remember that the Initial Report is meant to focus on specific recommendations/proposals, with brief, relevant, accompanying rationale, rather than be a comprehensive record of the WG's deliberations.

WG members are reminded that comments in the Google docs should be limited only to error corrections that you believe are necessary.  The documents will be open for comment until COB Tuesday, 25 February.  After that time they will be closed to comment.  While they are closed comments will not be visible, but they will be displayed during the WG meeting.

Draft Proposed Agenda:

  1.  Review Agenda and Updates to Statements of Interest
  2.  ICANN67 Status
  3.  Review Revisions from Action Items: TMCH Individual Proposals for which the Working Group is Seeking Input:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fh6KnBvqH78Pmo7qUBtR3JyIIvUifJ-8hzX9dcJruuA/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1fh6KnBvqH78Pmo7qUBtR3JyIIvUifJ-2D8hzX9dcJruuA_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=pHx2VgLeBUkGzKocmXOoBBhL4753w_2vn37aRHMG6mE&s=wMO-1FtvuW_B3Am7MC4vVwZ03d5TeTRZSNjheGu7Wi8&e=>
  4.  Finalize Discussion of Deliberations of the Working Group: URS Individual Proposals:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kHBPLtbp6BgqmxZGPHC1Yeciulvvk79niPOuURI8L5U/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1kHBPLtbp6BgqmxZGPHC1Yeciulvvk79niPOuURI8L5U_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=nXgVSaMtCITwPJxg7gWJGMiOEAeZJxi27vm2v-ZaGlQ&s=uUfbnYym6VWBHpPINrqXaYW-40q2nYJK4gkMnFiIC78&e=> – Start at Proposal #16
  5.  Review Project Change Request and Revised Work Plan (attached)
  6.  AOB

Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel

World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
_______________________________________________
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org<mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20200225/ca166e8d/attachment-0001.html>