[Gnso-ssr] starting up - refining our rules of engagement

[Mike O'Connor]

hi Patrik,

it’s great to have you on the list — and really great to have you helping out with clarifications like this one.

thanks,

mikey


On Feb 10, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> Thanks Mikey,
> 
> Let me clarify that if any SSAC members are participating in this
> discussion, they do that 100% on their personal capacity, and they do
> not speak on behalf of SSAC, or represent SSAC.
> 
> I have unfortunately to tell this repeatedly in ICANN nowadays because
> we have had a few incidents where third parties have claimed that "SSAC
> have the view that...".
> 
> If SSAC have, or had a view, that will be clearly stated as such, and if
> nothing very special happens, the SSAC view will be presented by me.
> 
> All of this so that SSAC members that are on this list can express
> themselves in these discussions freely. I can not, and I do not think
> ICANN can, risk having individuals with clue stay silent because they
> are tagged with a special affiliation.
> 
> If you want to tag a special SSAC affiliation with anyway, it is me.
> 
>   Patrik Fältström
>   SSAC Chair
> 
> On 2014-02-10 08:44, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> hi all,
>> 
>> it seems like we have a good group of interested folks subscribed to the
>> list (thanks for handling the logistics Glen!).
>> 
>> so why don’t we get under way…
>> 
>> i think i’ll post a couple of emails rather than smashing everything
>> together in one huge inaugural post.  so this one is to take a look at
>> the initial rules of engagement that i made up while drafting the
>> charter for this mailing list.  as with almost everything i write, there
>> are probably some things in here that might be better said.  so let’s
>> use this thread to get that hashed out.
>> 
>> here’s what i wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>          Approach
>> 
>>    The primary work product of this group will be periodic informal
>>    suggestions of SSR-related topics to be considered by the GNSO. The
>>    form of that consideration may vary. Possibilities include:
>> 
>>      o An Issue Report
>>      o An alert to a currently-running working group or implementation
>>        review team
>>      o Notifications to constituencies and stakeholder groups
>> 
>> 
>>    The group:
>> 
>>      o Will do its work via an email list – no teleconferences are planned
>>      o Is open to all members of the ICANN community – all AC's and
>>        SO's, staff, Board, etc.
>>      o Will require that all participants submit or update their GNSO
>>        Statement of Interest
>>        <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=14713457> before
>>        they are subscribed to the list
>>      o Will maintain open public email archives – and thus will not
>>        discuss private or confidential information
>>      o Will be convened by Mikey O'Connor until somebody gets tired of
>>        him and offers to take over
>>      o To join the mailing list
>>        please *RSVP *gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>        <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> see anything in there that needs to change?  or needs to be added?  this
>> would be a good thread to talk about those things.
>> 
>> off we go.
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
>> <http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
>> LinkedIn, etc.)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ssr mailing list
>> Gnso-ssr at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssr
>> 
> 
> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)