[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Draft principles - comments

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks a lot Nic.  Rather to add more comments, I will try to respond in my message.

Regarding principle 2, you said in your comment (NS3): "Is there an objective criteria for this?  I agree in principle to this principle, but this exception seems like it has the potential for abuse if left this broad.   Maybe something like "except where there is broad community consensus that there is an emergency case related to security and/or stability""  The problem as I see it with your suggestion is that if there is an emergency SSR issue, there is not time to check for community consensus.  Maybe we could add something though like this: "except in emergency cases such as risks to security and stability as defined in ICANN's SSR framework".

In your comment on principle 3 (NS5), you said that you "Agree with this opinion".  What opinion do you agree with?  I got the impression that you agree with the principle regardless of whether it differs with the current PDP manual.  Is that correct?

Before I respond to your other comments, let me suggest that we restructure the list of principles so that there is only one per page so that there will hopefully be room for all comments under each principle.  Marika/Mary - would you be able to do that?  If not, I can try to do it tomorrow.

Chuck

From: Nic Steinbach [mailto:nic at name.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 6:51 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Marika Konings; gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Draft principles - comments

Hello All,

Marika and Chuck thanks for your work. I am attaching my comments that incorporate Marika's initial feedback. Unfortunately, I somehow missed Chuck's responses. Currently reviewing them now, but wanted to get these out to the group.

Best,

Nic

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
Thanks Marika.  I inserted some responses to your comments to continue the discussion.  Hopefully, others will add their comments as well.  Discussing the issues you identified will make for a good agenda item for our first call(s).

Chuck

From: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 7:46 AM
To: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Draft principles - comments

To kick things off, I've added a couple of comments / questions as well as proposed edits to the draft provided by Chuck (see attached).

Best regards,

Marika

_______________________________________________
Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list
Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl



--
Nic Steinbach

[http://name.com/images/email-signature-logo1.jpg]
________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20131210/46d6682c/attachment-0001.html>