[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Latest version of draft principles for review

[Marika Konings]

Dear All,

Following our call yesterday, please find below some notes I took in
relation to the discussion on the draft principles (for a detailed report of
the meeting, please review the transcript and/or recording). Attached you
will find the latest version of the draft principles (note I've accepted all
the redlines to facilitate your review). You are encouraged to add any
further comments / proposed edits to the document itself ahead of the next
meeting (Thursday 19 December at 21.00 UTC).

Thanks,

Marika

* From Alan: Implementation has taken on so many different meanings and
different phases ­ that is the reason why we are here. There are certain
phases that do not need to be based in the multi-stakeholder model. Only
when there is substantive impact to stakeholders, then it needs to be based
in the multi-stakeholder model. If it is purely execution this can be
handled by staff without a need for a multi-stakeholder process. If the PDP
team had thought about the issue, they would have put the details in ­
impact was defined / foreseen as part of policy discussions, it may not
necessarily require community input / discussion? Involvement should not
equate to veto. Need some working definitions of some of the terms we are
using.
* Greg: Agrees with Alan ­ multi-stakeholder concept cannot be applied the
same way in a policy process or an implementation process. Nuance needs to
be added to express that. Timeframe for policy and implementation is
different. Definitions and principles are tied. Is there policy neutral
implementation (execution), i.e. decisions don¹t have any impact on the
policy recommendations while on the other hand you have implementation
decisions that affect the policy? Consider integrating principle 3 with 1,
and some of the administrative ones.
*  Nic: How can you determine who/how someone is impacted?
*  Michael: Multi-stakeholder model looks after interests of all parties. In
considering the whole process, we need to take that into account when
defining this principle.
* Chuck: Implementation even though it may be straightforward and may not
need further community consultation does not go against the
multi-stakeholder model. It may just be requiring the originating body to
confirm that implementation is as intended by the policy recommendations.
Also note that all these principles are interrelated. Possible rewording:
The need for multi-stakeholder principles does not end when you go from
policy to implementation. Should there be a sub principle that says criteria
should be developed and enforced when a multi-stakeholder process is
required? Objective is to avoid situation whereby Board/Staff decide that
something is implementation and does not require community involvement /
feedback. Should this sub-team develop some guidelines or should this be
done by the WG? Is it possible to define principles / sub-principles.
* CLO: other terms such as Œsubstantive impact¹ may need defining in this
context. Consider adding overarching principle that makes sure that
articulate the enshrined principles of the multi-stakeholder model and input
sought as part of policy discussions. Other statements may come in that will
add to this effort.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20131213/f68de075/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PI Working Principles - Updated 13 December.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 52224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20131213/f68de075/PIWorkingPrinciples-Updated13December-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20131213/f68de075/smime-0001.p7s>