[IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process

Hong Xue hongxueipr at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 05:55:27 UTC 2013


> thank you for your reaction. Not having followed every step of the debate, I
> do have a question : will the following variants have equal standing, and be
> accepted in China, Singapore and Taiwan,
> 中國 / 中国
> 台灣 / 台湾
>

Yes, Chinese community through CDNC has adopted the uniform variant
table. It is pretty sure that the above pairs of strings are deemed
the same in the community.

Hong

.
>
> 2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr at gmail.com>
>>
>> > *
>> > *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for
>> > instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or
>> > Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate,
>> > where
>> > there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a
>> > language
>> > or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national
>> > norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it
>> > has
>> > been settled. Do you share my concern?*
>> > *
>>
>> This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN
>> ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or
>> territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere
>> another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there
>> is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the
>> same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China
>> and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names.
>>
>> Hong
>>
>>
>>
>> > 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Dear IDN Working Group,
>> >>
>> >> A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development
>> >> Process
>> >> (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an ALAC
>> >> response to this document.
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the activation
>> >> of
>> >> IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you
>> >> feel
>> >> that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it
>> >> immediately.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> Rinalia Abdul Rahim
>> >>
>> >> sent via galaxy tab
>> >>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>> >> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20
>> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN
>> >> ccNSO
>> >> Policy Development Process
>> >> To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
>> >> alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/>
>> >> News Alert
>> >>
>> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
>> >>
>> >> 5 February 2013
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Forum Announcement:     Comment Period Opens on Date:   5 February 2013
>> >> Categories/Tags:
>> >>
>> >>  *   Top-Level Domains
>> >>  *   Policy Processes
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Purpose (Brief):        In the framework of the ccNSO Policy
>> >> Development
>> >> Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report<
>> >> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf>
>> >> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible
>> >> recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country
>> >> code
>> >> Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN ccTLD
>> >> managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's
>> >> of
>> >> IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public
>> >> comment.
>> >> Public Comment Box Link:
>> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This message was sent to matt.ashtiani at icann.org<mailto:
>> >> matt.ashtiani at icann.org> from:
>> >>
>> >> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Email Marketing by
>> >> [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <
>> >> http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Manage Your Subscription <
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904926&c=165637
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> ALAC-Announce mailing list
>> >> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
>> >>
>> >> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> IDN-WG mailing list
>> >> IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
>> >>
>> >> IDN WG Wiki:
>> >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IDN-WG mailing list
>> > IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
>> >
>> > IDN WG Wiki:
>> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Professor Dr. Hong Xue
>> Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
>> Beijing Normal University
>> http://www.iipl.org.cn/
>> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
>> Beijing 100875 China
>
>



-- 
Professor Dr. Hong Xue
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China



More information about the IDN-WG mailing list