[IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process

[JJS]

*Thank you Hong for the clarification.*
*Jean-Jacques.
*
2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr at gmail.com>

> > thank you for your reaction. Not having followed every step of the
> debate, I
> > do have a question : will the following variants have equal standing,
> and be
> > accepted in China, Singapore and Taiwan,
> > 中國 ／ 中国
> > 台灣 ／ 台湾
> >
>
> Yes, Chinese community through CDNC has adopted the uniform variant
> table. It is pretty sure that the above pairs of strings are deemed
> the same in the community.
>
> Hong
>
> .
> >
> > 2013/2/7 Hong Xue <hongxueipr at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > *
> >> > *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for
> >> > instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or
> >> > Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate,
> >> > where
> >> > there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if) a
> >> > language
> >> > or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept their national
> >> > norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not arise, or that it
> >> > has
> >> > been settled. Do you share my concern?*
> >> > *
> >>
> >> This is very interesting prospective. Given that the PDP is about IDN
> >> ccTLDs, the TLD strings should all be pertinent "country or
> >> territority names". It would be rare that one ccTLD want to interfere
> >> another ccTLD's IDN string in the same character set. At least, there
> >> is no problem in Chinese or CJK group, e.g. “日本” fortunately is the
> >> same in both Chinese and Japanese and "新加坡" is the same in both China
> >> and Singapore. I'm not so sure about Arabic usage of country names.
> >>
> >> Hong
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> Dear IDN Working Group,
> >> >>
> >> >> A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development
> >> >> Process
> >> >> (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should be an
> ALAC
> >> >> response to this document.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the
> activation
> >> >> of
> >> >> IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13 February you
> >> >> feel
> >> >> that there should be a response on this issue, please flag it
> >> >> immediately.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best regards,
> >> >>
> >> >> Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> >> >>
> >> >> sent via galaxy tab
> >> >>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> >> From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> >> >> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20
> >> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN
> >> >> ccNSO
> >> >> Policy Development Process
> >> >> To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
> >> >> alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/
> >
> >> >> News Alert
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-en.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
> >> >>
> >> >> 5 February 2013
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Forum Announcement:     Comment Period Opens on Date:   5 February
> 2013
> >> >> Categories/Tags:
> >> >>
> >> >>  *   Top-Level Domains
> >> >>  *   Policy Processes
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Purpose (Brief):        In the framework of the ccNSO Policy
> >> >> Development
> >> >> Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report<
> >> >>
> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf>
> >> >> [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible
> >> >> recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country
> >> >> code
> >> >> Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN
> ccTLD
> >> >> managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final Paper's
> >> >> of
> >> >> IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for public
> >> >> comment.
> >> >> Public Comment Box Link:
> >> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-en.htm
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This message was sent to matt.ashtiani at icann.org<mailto:
> >> >> matt.ashtiani at icann.org> from:
> >> >>
> >> >> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Email Marketing by
> >> >> [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <
> >> >> http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Manage Your Subscription <
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=904926&c=165637
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> ALAC-Announce mailing list
> >> >> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
> >> >>
> >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> IDN-WG mailing list
> >> >> IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
> >> >>
> >> >> IDN WG Wiki:
> >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > IDN-WG mailing list
> >> > IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
> >> >
> >> > IDN WG Wiki:
> >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Professor Dr. Hong Xue
> >> Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
> >> Beijing Normal University
> >> http://www.iipl.org.cn/
> >> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
> >> Beijing 100875 China
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Dr. Hong Xue
> Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
> Beijing Normal University
> http://www.iipl.org.cn/
> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
> Beijing 100875 China
>